Yeah, that's right, it is Nikon Adobe 1998 (I used to assume it is
similar to just plain Adobe 1998 RGB). For an archival purposes I just
keep the original format (i.e. Nikon Adobe 1998) and do not bother of
converting one to a regular Adobe 1998. If I'll reveal later the need
for such, I can do it
From: "Alex Z" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Once begining my scanning experience I set scanner's output format as
Adobe 98 RGB, do all the necessary editing in PS7, and save for an
archive as Adobe 98 RGB either.
>
Ok, but the files are tagged "Nikon Adobe 1998" out of the scanner. Do
you leave that as is
Yeah, a whiel ago I was also wondering people recommedning swithcing
off
Nikon CMS and lamenting about poor defualt Nikon's profiles. I was
never suffered from this with my LS-40. Scans come out in good colors,
contrast, I was nothing to complain about (I use NikonScan 3.1.2). I
never apply NikonSc
From: "Ellis Vener" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> it might make more sense to scan them as NEF (Nikon RAW) files
and archive those original scans.
>
Here's my reasoning... the scan itself is not very hard to repeat since
I have all originals and don't do that much to tweak the scans. Redoing
a NEF would b
On Saturday, December 13, 2003, at 06:51 PM, Ed Verkaik wrote:
> If these files are destined for agencies or
> clients, is there any problem leaving the profile as "Nikon Adobe
> 1998"?
This might be considered non-standard. You should convert to just Adobe
RGB(1998). Evidently there are some m
