Interesting review for printing from digital cameras. Too bad they only
used lower resolution images than the ones common on this list. There's a
lot of resampling, sharpening, interpolation, etc. going on in the print
drivers when the best source is a 2000x3000 that was already interpolated
in
The review does not seen to address the issue of print longevity. We know
what to expect with the Epson. Does anyone have longevity information for
the Canon, ie; has Wilhelm tested it?
Regards, Ron Carlson
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
] Re: Canon S9000 test better than Epson 1280
The review does not seen to address the issue of print longevity. We know
what to expect with the Epson. Does anyone have longevity information for
the Canon, ie; has Wilhelm tested it?
Regards, Ron Carlson
- Original Message -
From
Here's the link for the S9000 which links to the lightfastness tests page.
BK
- Original Message -
From: Ron Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2002 7:41 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Canon S9000 test better than Epson 1280
The review does
