David writes:
You've never ceased to amaze and dazzle me
with your limitless wisdom and knowledge of
this planet - and humanity in general.
Thanks.
I presume that you must be at least an
octogenarian to have amassed such a bottomless
pool of enigmatic-yet-pragmatic information/advice.
I
David writes:
Please allow me to describe a certain rascal
that I've stumbled onto. He seems to have an
exaggerated opinion of his *own* opinion.
Things are not always what they seem. Does this rascal have elaborate
protection mechanisms on his site to protect the inestimable value of his
Gregg writes:
I have many images and I can't decide which
ones are worthy to be shown to the public. Could
you please take a look at them and with all
your wisdom let me know which ones are good
enough to be stolen.
I'm no more qualified to determine that than anyone else. Besides, from
David writes:
But it's not quite that easy nor as cut-and=
dried as the above.
There aren't any other options. Anything you put on the site is likely to
be stolen. Anything you do not want stolen should not be put on the site.
For example, you've just thumbed-your-nose at
the
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of david/lisa
soderman
Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2002 8:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Disabling right-click, etc. (was: Web
homepage writing software)
Anthony Atkielski wrote
Preben wrote:
Should we perhaps leave it to the *eyes of the beholder*, instead of
stooping to sweeping generalisations.
All copyrighted material deserves protection against commercial pirating if
the originator so wishes...
RIGHT ON! RIGHT ON!! RIGHT ON!!!
Preben writes: I would be interested in knowing which photos
ARE worth protecting.?
Anthony Atkielski writes: The ones that are worth money.
Preben writes: As far as I know, in the finest museums of the
world (for what it is worth), you may stumble across
(quote) sunsets, breaking
Anthony,
I have many images and I can't decide which ones are worthy to be shown to
the public. Could you please take a look at them and with all your wisdom
let me know which ones are good enough to be stolen. Finally someone can
answer the question what is art?.
thanks,
Gregg
From: Anthony
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Of course. But originators with an exaggerated opinion of their work and
draconian methods of protecting it won't have too many people viewing their
masterpieces.
Oh the irony of it all, Anthony. Please allow me to describe a certain
rascal that I've stumbled onto.
