On Fri, 11 Oct 2002 19:28:39 -0700 George Hartzell
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I think that it can make a big difference between whether you degrade
> the frequency of the image before/while it's scanned (e.g. defocusing
> the scanner) or whether you try to blur in photoshop.
>
> When you do it
You are correct. Once the errors have been incorporated into the file
data, it takes some much bigger crayons to hide them. ;-)
Art
George Hartzell wrote:
> Tony Sleep writes:
> > [...]
> > With all aliasing the easy cure is to degrade the frequency of image
> > information so that it falls
I don't know how Vuescan works, but in NikonScan, once you've done an
autofocus, you can bump the focus slider manually. Since there's already an
uncertainty of at least a half a count, I'd try bumping it by two, to see if
that helps.
However, I'm not sure defocusing will reduce aliasing, because