[filmscanners] Re: Messages

2002-07-09 Thread Julian Robinson
Come on Tony give me a break! I don't give a fig how much traffic there is on the list, I have never complained about too much or too little. I was only trying to reassure some people that I too (i.e. a third party) had received no messages, and quantify it a little, so they would realise the

[filmscanners] Re: Messages

2002-07-09 Thread TonySleep
On Tue, 09 Jul 2002 11:27:36 -0500 Cliff Ober ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Come on Tony give me a break! I don't give a fig how much traffic there is on the list, I have never complained about too much or too little. Sorry, this wasn't supposed to be directed at you Cliff, just a

[filmscanners] Re: Messages

2002-07-06 Thread Julian Robinson
I got nothing for three days.. maybe this is because Todd has given the dynamic range discussion a special list! We are without Austin on that list, otherwise the discussion is going exactly as it was here - busily, and in circles! Julian At 06:46 07/07/02, you wrote: I was concerned the

[filmscanners] Re: Messages

2002-07-06 Thread Arthur Entlich
You're dreaming... we all just are taking a vacation from pulling our hair out (the little many of us have left, that is) ;-) Art Philip Elkin wrote: I was concerned the server was down or my computer was duff as all has been quiet on the list for a few days. However I would like to think

[filmscanners] Re: Messages

2002-07-06 Thread Arthur Entlich
Thanks to Todd for that... maybe some will return to this list now ;-) Art Julian Robinson wrote: I got nothing for three days.. maybe this is because Todd has given the dynamic range discussion a special list! We are without Austin on that list, otherwise the discussion is going exactly