I got nothing for three days.. maybe this is because Todd has given the
dynamic range discussion a special list!
We are without Austin on that list, otherwise the discussion is going
exactly as it was here - busily, and in circles!
Julian
At 06:46 07/07/02, you wrote:
>I was concerned the serve
You're dreaming... we all just are taking a vacation from pulling our
hair out (the little many of us have left, that is) ;-)
Art
Philip Elkin wrote:
> I was concerned the server was down or my computer was duff as all has been
> quiet on the list for a few days. However I would like to think e
Thanks to Todd for that... maybe some will return to this list now ;-)
Art
Julian Robinson wrote:
> I got nothing for three days.. maybe this is because Todd has given the
> dynamic range discussion a special list!
>
> We are without Austin on that list, otherwise the discussion is going
> exac
Come on Tony give me a break! I don't give a fig how much traffic there is
on the list, I have never complained about too much or too little. I was
only trying to reassure some people that I too (i.e. a third party) had
received no messages, and quantify it a little, so they would realise the
tra
On Tue, 09 Jul 2002 11:27:36 -0500 Cliff Ober ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Come on Tony give me a break! I don't give a fig how much traffic there
> is
> on the list, I have never complained about too much or too little.
Sorry, this wasn't supposed to be directed at you Cliff, just a
lighthe