[filmscanners] Re: Misc Multi Pro/VueScan/16-bit stitching

2002-03-03 Thread Herm
You cant do it in PS, Picture Window Pro will do it and also allow precise alignment, auto or manual. Cost is about $100 I beleive. This is a standard technique in astrophotography, as you can see in my website. "M. Denis Hill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >QUESTION FOR ANYONE: I also have a co

[filmscanners] RE: Misc Multi Pro/VueScan/16-bit stitching

2002-03-02 Thread M. Denis Hill
"QUESTION FOR ANYONE: I also have a considerable library of 6x17 panoramic > negatives and transparencies. With the Minolta, I must stitch two (or three) > scans to get in an entire image. My experience with this is that Photoshop > won't let me use the move tool to combine 16-bit images. Am I

[filmscanners] Re: Misc Multi Pro/VueScan/16-bit stitching

2002-03-02 Thread Op's
"QUESTION FOR ANYONE: I also have a considerable library of 6x17 panoramic > negatives and transparencies. With the Minolta, I must stitch two (or three) > scans to get in an entire image. My experience with this is that Photoshop > won't let me use the move tool to combine 16-bit images. Am I

[filmscanners] Re: Misc Multi Pro/VueScan/16-bit stitching

2002-03-02 Thread
> QUESTION FOR ANYONE: I also have a considerable library of 6x17 panoramic > negatives and transparencies. With the Minolta, I must stitch two (or three) > scans to get in an entire image. My experience with this is that Photoshop > won't let me use the move tool to combine 16-bit images. Am I do