try using it without ICE and see what happens
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
Send the scan back to the repair shop (I assume it is Nikon) and ask
them what's wrong.
Peter Marquis-Kyle wrote:
In the hope that someone might still be reading this list, I'll ask a question:
The context: My Nikon LS-30 scanner has just come back from a long stay in the
repair shop, where it
Dieder Bylsma wrote:
try using it without ICE and see what happens
Thanks for the suggestion, Dieder. I just did a test with and without ICE -- it
made no difference to the waves.
Any other ideas?
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Lotus M50 wrote:
Send the scan back to the repair shop (I assume it is Nikon) and ask
them what's wrong.
Thanks, I will be taking the scanner back to the repairer (who is independent of
Nikon, but is authorised and recommended by the Australian Nikon importers) and
ask them to fix it properly.
At 7:58 PM +1000 3/10/05, Peter Marquis-Kyle wrote:
In the hope that someone might still be reading this list, I'll ask
a question:
My Nikon LS-30 scanner [snip] was fitted with new scanning and
focussing stepper motors [and] now produces files with a weird
waviness. [snip] What could be causing
I'm not claiming to be an expert on scanner mechanics and electronics,
but to me this looks like it could come from several sources. From a
strictly mechanical basic, it could be something very wrong with the
mechanism that moves the film carrier, causing it to be shifted from
slide to side as it
I'll go along with the carrier moving the film being the problem. The
stepper motor should be just applying force to a platform that can only
move back and forth. It shouldn't be able to cause a wobble. The stepper
only has 4 unique patterns in how it is energized electronically, so you
would
Peter Marquis-Kyle wrote:
I'm annoyed to find it now produces files with a weird
waviness. See the effect here:
http://www.marquis-kyle.com.au/mt/000689.htm
Throw it back at the service technician, it clearly hasn't been tested or
repaired as properly as they stated. Unless there's a transit
Tony Sleep wrote:
Throw it back at the service technician, it clearly hasn't been
tested or
repaired as properly as they stated. Unless there's a transit screw
done up
somewhere still :)
It's going back to the shop as soon as I can arrange it. No, it's not a transit
screw...
I'd hazard a
I second that emotion - I don't consider myself old at 55, nor a fogie, but
thank you - I just picked up a PS digital for current use, but for fine art
and long term, I'm still using film.
Maris
Peter Marquis-Kyle wrote:
And thanks (again) for keeping
this list
going -- the dwindling crew of
10 matches
Mail list logo
