Nope, XP Home is NT based too.
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neville Skinner) wrote:
> At 14:33 29/04/02 +0200, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
>
>
> >In general, though, anything based on NT (Win 2K, Win XP) will be a
> huge
> >step ahead of the consumer 32-bit Windows versions (9
At 14:33 29/04/02 +0200, Anthony Atkielski wrote:
>In general, though, anything based on NT (Win 2K, Win XP) will be a huge
>step ahead of the consumer 32-bit Windows versions (95, 98, 98SE, ME, etc.).
While Win 2K is basically NT5, I thought Win XP was based on Win98??
Kindest regards,
Nev
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: OT: which wintel OS for digital imaging?
Except for Norton Anti-Virus all the other Norton System stuff has never
done anything for me but cause headaches and more problems. In my last
notebook, whenever I installed Norton (I forget what it was c
Dave writes:
> I do Norton Win and Disk Doctor, then defrag.
Things like that were useful in Windows 3.1, but they haven't been necessary
in ages; they probably hurt more than help in NTFS-based systems like
Windows NT, 2000, and XP.
> Read about utilities including System Mechanic
> here:
Hmm
2K by a mile.
- Original Message -
From: "JimD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm running a Polaroid SS4000 as my scanner & utilize
Insight, Vuescan and PS6 in my workflow.
I'm planning to update my wintel box and need to
choose between Win2K & WinXP.
Which should I choose?
Thanks,
JimD