l case and drive fans if needed.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Whidbey Net
> Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2002 12:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Re:Computer size(New Topic)
>
>
> >
Laurie writes:
> I know of no PC motherboard that will support
> that much RAM even if one could aford to buy it.
That's why I said "if you can afford AND CONFIGURE."
My own motherboard is limited to 1.5 GB (and that's what I installed).
Windows XP Home Edition is limited to 2 GB (a marketing-i
TED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anthony Atkielski
Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2002 3:44 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Re:Computer size(New Topic)
Rob writes:
> What size computer do I need so that I may
> work happily with Photoshop and 200M scan
> fil
On Saturday, May 11, 2002 8:39 AM, Rob "Op's"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Photoshop
>200M scan file size.
>I now have a P3 800 / 780M ram + scratch disk.
That should be OK, if you have allocated enough RAM for PS. Try 75%.
>This is using sometimes 3G PShop memory
The History (undo) list ea
Denis writes:
> To carry disk performance to the max, go with
> a striped SCSI array of 15000 RPM drives!
Very expensive, though. Also, one thing tends to lead to another: If you
use 15000 RPM drives, you soon have to start worrying about keeping the
whole machine from melting down in its own
How big?
Bigger than a bread box ;-)
Adobe suggests that you should have at least 3-5 times the amount of RAM
memory in your system as the image size to avoid needing the scratch
disk. SO, a gig of memory should be close to doing that. However, the
use of the history pallet in recent PS versio
Rob writes:
> What size computer do I need so that I may
> work happily with Photoshop and 200M scan
> file size.
The largest and fastest you can afford. Seriously.
RAM is the most important. You should have at least a couple of times as
much RAM as your image size to work at a reasonable sp
