On Sun, 6 Jan 2002 12:30:39 -0500 Owen P. Evans ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
. No one
seems to disagree with my reasoning or they haven't yet spoken up.
Perhaps because (IMO) Vuescan and Silverfast are different tools, aimed at
different kinds of user practicing quite different workflows.
I
If you want to waste a lot of time getting bogged down with a overly
complicated, finicky, difficult to use software program
Overly complicated, finicky, etc is a matter of opinion - we all have our
biases. I find your description to be word perfect for many scanner
drivers but I didn't
- Original Message -
From: Ian Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2002 1:30 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Silverfast vs. Vuescan
How right you are Mr Lyons in ALL that you said but! I believe the situation
canalso be sumerised in the following way
Bottom
line here is: we all have our opinions and the perfect scanner software
hasn't been written yet.
I agree completely. SilverFast is a nice product, and the engineers
at LaserSoft are quite good.
Regards,
Ed Hamrick
But they're not on this list every day helping end users find good
Ed,
Do you have any suggestions for improving VueScan? I'm always
interested in people's suggestions, especially from people who have
tried it and don't like it.
None that I would care to share or advise you of on this list. My earlier
message was not intended to be critical of Vuescan
Owen,
This list has a purpose and those who ask questions tend to do for a reason.
Some (not many) will answer those questions with an alternate agenda. For
the most part I think your posts are designed for no other purpose than to
flame!
I don't think flames are justified.
I wrote this
