PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:28 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: What can you advise?
As both you and Henning suggested, based upon review of my files, my
suggestion of mold growth at over 30% humidity was too conservative.
After doing a scan of my physical paper
As both you and Henning suggested, based upon review of my files, my
suggestion of mold growth at over 30% humidity was too conservative.
After doing a scan of my physical paper files, I found my memory had
failed me, as a reference by Kodak regarding preventing fungal growth on
films
At 7:08 PM -0700 9/26/02, Arthur Entlich wrote:
Austin Franklin wrote:
I also have a dehumidifier in my lab...I can't say if that helps a lot or
not, but I don't have any dust problems on my stored film. On film I simply
leave lying around, perhaps.
Actually, a moderate humidity level
: [filmscanners] Re: What can you advise?
(...snip)
The only other 4000 dpi scanner I know of is the Canon FS4000. It is a
diffused lighting scanner with an IR cleaning process called FARE.
However, although it is by far the least expensive 4000 dpi scanner, the
major complaints are that it is quite slow
Austin Franklin wrote:
I'm curious if you have any references on that. I've not had any mold
growth, and it seems quite comfortable...and as I said, no camera, equipment
etc. problems at all. It's been a most palatable environment. The
dehumidifier is off during winter, probably from
I hate when that happens ;-)
This was supposed to read Running Win 98, I CAN'T use Firewire
Art
Arthur Entlich wrote:
Hmmm... This is news to me, but I haven't tried it. Running Win 98 I
can use Firewire. (annoying!)
Art
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't get my SS4000+ to run on
I'm curious if you have any references on that. I've not had any mold
growth, and it seems quite comfortable...and as I said, no
camera, equipment
etc. problems at all. It's been a most palatable environment. The
dehumidifier is off during winter, probably from October to April.
Best of luck, and we look forward to your comments once you make a decision.
Art
Geoff Clack wrote:
Up to my neck at work, I need to put put my film scanner quest to one
side for a while. But I would like to thank all who have contributed,
on and off list. You've given me a lot of very
In a message dated 9/26/2002 10:25:46 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now Howard, I was trying to be discrete here ;-)
You were discreet...just thought it was time to 'fess up.
Hope your back is better.
Howard
Hmmm... This is news to me, but I haven't tried it. Running Win 98 I
can use Firewire. (annoying!)
Art
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't get my SS4000+ to run on Vuescan with a Firewire connection...crashes the
whole system. Anyone else manage it?
Howard
It will come
with Silverfast 5.5
I also have a dehumidifier in my lab...I can't say if that
helps a lot or
not, but I don't have any dust problems on my stored film. On
film I simply
leave lying around, perhaps.
Actually, a moderate humidity level keeps dust levels down, by reducing
static, and by making the dust
I really tried to get them to re-label and name the features, really I did!
If I get a chance over the next few days I will try to put together some
of my comments at the time I was beta testing this, and make a better
manual. It really isn't that hard to use (although I don't bother with
it
Art,
Sheesh, I sure hope Austin doesn't read this!
-JimD
At 07:03 PM 9/26/2002 -0700, Arthur Entlich wrote:
You've raised exactly the crux of the issue. Nikon scanner users have
no choice. They must use dICE when it is available to them.
I have an admission to make. I live is a rural area,
: [filmscanners] Re: What can you advise?
Art,
Sheesh, I sure hope Austin doesn't read this!
-JimD
At 07:03 PM 9/26/2002 -0700, Arthur Entlich wrote:
You've raised exactly the crux of the issue. Nikon scanner users have
no choice. They must use dICE when it is available to them.
I have an admission
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of JimD
Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 12:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: What can you advise?
Art,
Sheesh, I sure hope Austin doesn't read this!
-JimD
At 07:03
Yeah, that's another possible criterion: depth of field. This is important
if you have lots of badly warped slides.
--
Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco
Paulmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Alex Zabrovsky
In the past people have lament about AF uneven performance on
16 matches
Mail list logo
