Yeah, that's another possible criterion: depth of field. This is important
if you have lots of badly warped slides.
--
Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco
Paulmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Alex Zabrovsky
>
> In the past people have lament about AF uneven performance on
> orig
In a message dated 9/26/2002 10:25:46 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
<< Now Howard, I was trying to be discrete here ;-)
>>
You were discreet...just thought it was time to 'fess up.
Hope your back is better.
Howard
--
Hmmm... This is news to me, but I haven't tried it. Running Win 98 I
can use Firewire. (annoying!)
Art
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I can't get my SS4000+ to run on Vuescan with a Firewire connection...crashes the
>whole system. Anyone else manage it?
> Howard
>
>
>
>>It will come
>>with Silve
> > I also have a dehumidifier in my lab...I can't say if that
> helps a lot or
> > not, but I don't have any dust problems on my stored film. On
> film I simply
> > leave lying around, perhaps.
>
>
> Actually, a moderate humidity level keeps dust levels down, by reducing
> static, and by making
I really tried to get them to re-label and name the features, really I did!
If I get a chance over the next few days I will try to put together some
of my comments at the time I was beta testing this, and make a better
manual. It really isn't that hard to use (although I don't bother with
it mys
Art,
Sheesh, I sure hope Austin doesn't read this!
-JimD
At 07:03 PM 9/26/2002 -0700, Arthur Entlich wrote:
>You've raised exactly the crux of the issue. Nikon scanner users have
>no choice. They must use dICE when it is available to them.
>
>I have an admission to make. I live is a rural area
PROTECTED]
> Subject: [filmscanners] Re: What can you advise?
>
>
> Art,
> Sheesh, I sure hope Austin doesn't read this!
> -JimD
>
> At 07:03 PM 9/26/2002 -0700, Arthur Entlich wrote:
> >You've raised exactly the crux of the issue. Nikon scanner users have
&g
e. I believe this is reasonably universally known.
>
>Austin
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of JimD
> > Sent: Friday, September 27, 2002 12:40 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subj
At 7:08 PM -0700 9/26/02, Arthur Entlich wrote:
>Austin Franklin wrote:
>
>>
>> I also have a dehumidifier in my lab...I can't say if that helps a lot or
>> not, but I don't have any dust problems on my stored film. On film I simply
>> leave lying around, perhaps.
>
>
>Actually, a moderate hum
: Thursday, September 26, 2002 6:57 AM
> Subject: [filmscanners] Re: What can you advise?
> (...snip)
> The only other 4000 dpi scanner I know of is the Canon FS4000. It is a
> diffused lighting scanner with an IR cleaning process called FARE.
>
> However, although it is by far the
Austin Franklin wrote:
>
> I'm curious if you have any references on that. I've not had any mold
> growth, and it seems quite comfortable...and as I said, no camera, equipment
> etc. problems at all. It's been a most palatable environment. The
> dehumidifier is off during winter, probably f
I hate when that happens ;-)
This was supposed to read Running Win 98, I CAN'T use Firewire
Art
Arthur Entlich wrote:
> Hmmm... This is news to me, but I haven't tried it. Running Win 98 I
> can use Firewire. (annoying!)
>
> Art
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>>I can't get my SS4000+ to
> >
> > I'm curious if you have any references on that. I've not had any mold
> > growth, and it seems quite comfortable...and as I said, no
> camera, equipment
> > etc. problems at all. It's been a most palatable environment. The
> > dehumidifier is off during winter, probably from October to
Best of luck, and we look forward to your comments once you make a decision.
Art
Geoff Clack wrote:
> Up to my neck at work, I need to put put my film scanner quest to one
> side for a while. But I would like to thank all who have contributed,
> on and off list. You've given me a lot of very us
>
> As both you and Henning suggested, based upon review of my files, my
> suggestion of mold growth at over 30% humidity was too conservative.
>
> After doing a scan of my physical paper files, I found my memory had
> failed me, as a reference by Kodak regarding preventing fungal growth on
> film
hur Entlich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 12:28 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: What can you advise?
As both you and Henning suggested, based upon review of my files, my
suggestion of mold growth at over 30% humidity was too conservativ
16 matches
Mail list logo
