I've been trying to sent a posting to the list but it doesn't appear and I
don't get any admin/error messages. This test is just to see if a
message with different text fares any better!
Al Bond
test
Ken Weissblum
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
Test - please ignore
_
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with
test
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
Not receiving posts today??
Owen P. Evans
Osgoode, Ontario. Canada
(near our nation's capital; Ottawa)
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe
In response to an administrator request, I am attempting to comply with plain
text requirement. Looking for acceptance or rejection from the site only.
Thanks
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with
testing
M
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
I have a test version of VueScan for the SprintScan 120. If anyone
would like to test it, it can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/files/test120.sit (for Mac OS 8/9/X)
http://www.hamrick.com/files/test120.zip (for Windows)
To test the Windows version, unzip it into c:\vuescan
If
- Original Message -
From: Tony Sleep [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2001 9:30 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Test Imacon, Nikon.Polaroid
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001 01:17:28 -0400 Dave King
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
If there are no mirrors in either
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001 01:17:28 -0400 Dave King ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
If there are no mirrors in either, what would explain better sharpness
in the Imacon (assuming flat film in the Polaroid and Nikon)?
A bigger budget for the lens? ;) - but also the whole point of a curved
film gate is
A small comparison between Imacon Photo 3200 ppi , Polaroid SS120 4000
ppi, and Nikon LS4000 at 4000 ppi.
Test slide 24 x 36 by Leitz was used as reference. ( glass mounted)
Test slide 24 x36 un mounted.
1. Imacon at 3200 ppi was a lot sharper and show significant more details
than
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Mikael Risedal wrote:
So what can we expect from Nikon LS 8000. Im thrilled to hear from Rafe and
Lawrence what they have discovered about
sharpness, curved film problem on a 6 x 7 cm slide or negative film.
There's no question in my mind that depth of field
(or is
- Original Message -
From: Mikael Risedal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 4:23 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Test Imacon, Nikon.Polaroid
A small comparison between Imacon Photo 3200 ppi , Polaroid SS120
4000
ppi, and Nikon LS4000 at 4000 ppi.
Test slide
Risedal
From: Hemingway, David J [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Test Imacon, Nikon.Polaroid
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 14:33:41 -0400
Mikael,
I did this test myself with a 6x6 transparency. To do a fair test
://www.stereoscopy.com/reel3d/mounts-twin.html
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Raphael Bustin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Test Imacon, Nikon.Polaroid
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Mikael Risedal wrote:
So what can we
LS8000
-Original Message-
From: Mikael Risedal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 3:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Test Imacon, Nikon.Polaroid
David
We did the test with USM of and on , on all scanners, we also
set USM
I don't know for sure the optical effect of the mirrors. I guess I should
ask someone.
David
-Original Message-
From: Dave King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 3:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Test Imacon, Nikon.Polaroid
1. Imacon at 3200 ppi was a lot sharper and show significant more details
than the Nikon and Polaroid scanner does.
Yep! However, you must ensure that the Unsharp mask feature is switched to
OFF AND the Unsharp ask slider is set to MINUS 60 or it will still
apply sharpening. So I was
I did this test myself with a 6x6 transparency. To do a fair test it is
important to have USM of on all scanners. With the Imacon that it not so
straight forward. When you uncheck the USM box it is not really off. When
you set the slider to zero it is not really off. I specifically
Also, one feature of the Imacon is the magnetic curved film holders. I am
not sure if it actually is better or not, but it is a feature.
Have no doubts about it. Not only is it a feature, it works!
Ian Lyons
http://www.computer-darkroom.com
Also, one feature of the Imacon is the magnetic curved film
holders. I am
not sure if it actually is better or not, but it is a feature.
Have no doubts about it. Not only is it a feature, it works!
Would you please describe in detail how you determined it works?
It is better in practice of course, but with a little forethought and
extra work that benefit can be negated.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Austin Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 3:57 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Test Imacon
- Original Message -
From: rafeb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 5:47 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Test Imacon, Nikon.Polaroid
At 03:57 PM 7/13/01 -0400, Austin wrote:
The primary advantage of the Imacon design is the unfolded light
path
thanks
!--
--=_NextPart_000_006E_01C046BA.4BE47A60
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
--=_NextPart_000_006E_01C046BA.4BE47A60
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
26 matches
Mail list logo
