Jake writes ...
> I seem to remember somewhere, on this or another list, that there
was an
> increase of the Dmax from 3.4 to 3.? when using the multi-scanning
> capability with the Silverfast software package available with the
SS4000.
>
> It would seem to me that one could average out noise thi
> the pass-after-pass registration not being perfect.
I have found that to be true on my SS4k...but not only is the overall image
registration off, the line to line registration is off just enough to make
it virtually unusable. It works great for a single pass though...
The Leafscan 45 does t
Tomasz,
This is the only information that I have.
http://www.robgalbraith.com/diginews/2000-09/2000_09_29_pk2000_4.html#sprint
scan
I contacted a Polaroid dealer and they had no information either.
Jake
>From: "fotografia - tomasz zakrzewski"
> Jake,
> I'm also interested in this scanner. D
If the gods are with us mid Jan. in the US. I would expect street price to
be $3500 -$3700 but don't hold me to that.
David
-Original Message-
From: fotografia - tomasz zakrzewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2000 6:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Odp: Density
of course you can do it manually in pshop...
make several scans, then register and combine them using mode of darkest to
mix the layers. it should be possible within a max. deviation of 0.5 pixel.
a bit tedious though
sirius
> > increase of the Dmax from 3.4 to 3.? when using the mult
ssage-
From: Hemingway, David J <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sunday, October 29, 2000 2:27 PM
Subject: RE: Density increase w/SilverFast and SS4000?
>If the gods are with us mid Jan. in the US. I would expect street price to
>be $3500 -$37
> It would seem to me that one could average out noise this way, but not
> increase the density range. A lack of noise would be desireable,
> although
> truly better definition of shadow details would seem to be a hardware
> function, in my thinking anyway.
If you eliminate noise, you increase
