Re: More inane arguing...please, just ignore - WAS - RE: filmscanners: X-ray and digital camera

2001-09-09 Thread Tom Scales
Do you actually read? I posted the link showing that this is an urban legend - a hoax, quite some time ago. This entire thread is ridiculous. Grow up and shut up. Tom From: "Austin Franklin" > > Did you ever think that the "hoax" that you claim was inaccurate for ONLY > those airlines, and tha

Re: More inane arguing...please, just ignore - WAS - RE: filmscanners: X-ray and digital camera

2001-09-10 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Austin writes: > Did you ever think that the "hoax" that you > claim was inaccurate for ONLY those airlines, > and that for another airline it may have been > true? No, of course not. It would be an illogical extrapolation. If it is untrue for one aircraft, the one actually named, and if there

RE: More inane arguing...please, just ignore - WAS - RE: filmscanners: X-ray and digital camera

2001-09-10 Thread Austin Franklin
I apologize to the news group for partaking in this utterly foolish game. This is the last post I will do on "airline trays". > > Did you ever think that the "hoax" that you > > claim was inaccurate for ONLY those airlines, > > and that for another airline it may have been > > true? No, of cour

Re: More inane arguing...please, just ignore - WAS - RE: filmscanners: X-ray and digital camera

2001-09-10 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Austin writes: > What's illogical, is any discussion with you. You'll note that personal attacks are absent from my posts, but I do provide evidence for my assertions. In contrast, your posts are mostly personal attacks, but evidence for your assertions is absent. As usual, I shall leave the c

Re: More inane arguing...please, just ignore - WAS - RE: filmscanners: X-ray and digital camera

2001-09-11 Thread Arthur Entlich
Anthony Atkielski wrote: > > Austin writes: > > > What's illogical, is any discussion with you. > > You'll note that personal attacks are absent from my posts, but I do provide > evidence for my assertions. In contrast, your posts are mostly personal > attacks, but evidence for your assertio

RE: More inane arguing...please, just ignore - WAS - RE: filmscanners: X-ray and digital camera

2001-09-11 Thread Austin Franklin
> I believe you are both seriously damaged goods, who deserve each other. > > The only problem is, we, the other members of this list, do NOT deserve > either of you. Excuse me, Arthur? No one deserves YOU! There was no cause for your insult and your comments are absolutely inappropriate and a