[filmscanners] RE: filmscanners Digest

> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Hi - I've subscribed to this list for a while, and I have some > scanner issues that I'm sure have been beaten like a dead horse > in the past. I have not figured out how to search the > filmscanners archive - is there a way to do that? http://www.mail-archive.com/[

[filmscanners] Re: filmscanners Digest

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked: "Hi - I've subscribed to this list for a while, and I have some scanner issues that I'm sure have been beaten like a dead horse in the past. I have not figured out how to search the filmscanners archive - is there a way to do that?" - Try

[filmscanners] Re: filmscanners Digest

Hi - I've subscribed to this list for a while, and I have some scanner issues that I'm sure have been beaten like a dead horse in the past. I have not figured out how to search the filmscanners archive - is there a way to do that? Thanks, DAB --

[filmscanners] Re: filmscanners Digest for

> It`s quite possible that he is unaware of Tony`s personal email > address, as am I, even though I`ve been a member of this list for > perhaps a year. While a definite possibility, he could always ask for that information on list and direct his comments to Tony's personal address once he obtained

[filmscanners] Re: Filmscanners - is this about as goodasitgets?

Julian, As I said at the end of my last post, Nikon Capture allows you to alter the 'exposure' of the Nikon raw file by +/- 2 stops, so presumably the 'normal exposure' tiff or jpeg has had 2 stops chopped off each end. As for your last point, you just need a different sort of projector - to pro

[filmscanners] Re: Filmscanners - is this about as goodasitgets?

At 12:02 28/01/03, Paul wrote: >Digital's contrast range is the ratio of the clipping level to the noise >level. That's bigger than 7 stops. My DiMage 7 is more like 9, meaning that >the amount of noise I see on the 12-bit digital output is about three bits >or less. From what I've read, the 35mm

[filmscanners] Re: Filmscanners - is this about as good asitgets?

At 08:56 PM 1/27/2003, you wrote: >Hi Sam, > > > This surprised me, but only because I didn't remember it being said > > in the many digital-vs-film discussions I've seen. That is, it didn't > > surprise me because I doubt it. It's just that the digital-vs-film > > war seems to be conducted so much

[filmscanners] RE: Filmscanners - is this about as good as itgets?

the printing processes, ink jet, dye transfer and yet-to-be developed printing processes. Tom -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Simon Lamb Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2003 6:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Filmscanners

[filmscanners] Re: Filmscanners - is this about as good as itgets?

On 26/01/03 21:44, "Tim Atherton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > For a few years, Nikon, Canon, Polaroid, Minolta were all outdoing each > other producing better general level filmscanners culminating in, for > example, the LS2000 or 4000 for Nikon. > > My feeling is, that with the huge boom in pro

[filmscanners] Re: filmscanners: Pattern with Minolta Scan Multi

Thanks Robert, Long time since I've been right about anything. ;-) Todd > Todd, > > --- Todd Flashner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> on 11/24/01 1:26 PM, Robert Meier wrote: >> >>> Well, it seems everybody agrees that these are Newton Rings. >> >> Well, I'll be the outsider and say I don't think

[filmscanners] Re: filmscanners: Importance of Copyright on Images

On Fri, 07 Sep 2001 21:23:50 -0400 Larry Berman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Some of you may have heard about Google's new search engine for images. Google say they respect robots.txt, so if you don't want material indexed, preventing it is easy enough. Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.

[filmscanners] Re: filmscanners: Vuescan memory error

[EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [filmscanners] Re: filmscanners: Vuescan memory error >Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2001 18:39:07 -0500 > >do an exhaustive test of the memory, try Norton 2002 or download a test >program >suitable for Win2k.. a complete test will tak

[filmscanners] RE: filmscanners: SS4000 Rebate UPC

-- >From: JackG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 9:26 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject:[filmscanners] Re: filmscanners: SS4000 Rebate UPC > >Nope, sent mine in about the same time. > >John in OKC >- Original Message - &g

[filmscanners] RE: filmscanners: SS4000 Rebate UPC

mpany issuing the rebate. David -Original Message- From: JackG [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 9:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:[filmscanners] Re: filmscanners: SS4000 Rebate UPC Nope, sent mine in about the same time. John i

[filmscanners] RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC

Just thought I'd bring to everyone's attention the following message that now appears on the US webby: "OOPS! "The registry key file for the regsweep application was not included in the original Nikon Scan 3.12 download for Windows. This file is NOT required for Macintosh systems. "If you downl

[filmscanners] RE: Fw: Re: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC

Norman, your email client prolly has a rule that transfers messages sent via the filmscanners "list" to your "Filmscanners" folder. You will need to create a new rule that takes account of the different routing that messages now undergo. Jawed ---

[filmscanners] Re: ADMIN: IMPORTANT re Filmscanners list

ect: [filmscanners] Re: ADMIN: IMPORTANT re Filmscanners list On Fri, 21 Dec 2001 14:14:26 -0500 Norman Unsworth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Fri, 21 Dec 2001 14:14:26 -0500 Norman Unsworth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I've adjusted my rules accordingly, no problem. However, nearly all

[filmscanners] Re: filmscanners: SS4000 Rebate UPC

Nope, sent mine in about the same time. John in OKC - Original Message - From: "Andy Darlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 1:19 AM Subject: [filmscanners] Re: filmscanners: SS4000 Rebate UPC Hello: Has anyone reci

[filmscanners] Re: filmscanners: SS4000 Rebate UPC

Still waiting here too. Tom - Original Message - From: "Andy Darlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 1:19 AM Subject: [filmscanners] Re: filmscanners: SS4000 Rebate UPC Hello: Has anyone recieved their $200 rebate

[filmscanners] Re: filmscanners: SS4000 Rebate UPC

I'm still waiting. Sent in the paperwork in the first week of Sept. Salutations, David Lewiston - Original Message - From: "Andy Darlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 9:19 PM Subject: [filmscanners] Re: film

[filmscanners] Re: filmscanners: SS4000 Rebate UPC

Hello: Has anyone recieved their $200 rebate from SS4000 purchases? Mine was purchased in Early September and the rebate form went out soon after. I'm still waiting patiently, Thanks, Andy Darlow

[filmscanners] Re: ADMIN: IMPORTANT re Filmscanners list

On Fri, 21 Dec 2001 14:14:26 -0500 Norman Unsworth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Fri, 21 Dec 2001 14:14:26 -0500 Norman Unsworth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I've adjusted my rules accordingly, no problem. However, nearly all > messages > are coming in 'on behalf of' Tony Sleep. As a result, t

[filmscanners] Re: Fw: Re: filmscanners: Polaroid SS4000

mber 21, 2001 11:05 AM Subject: [filmscanners] Fw: Re: filmscanners: Polaroid SS4000 Forwarded by list admin due to server transfer. Apologies for the delay Forwarded Message Received: from mail.cix.co.uk (UIDL=0:_H9G.7epI8.sulphur) by tsphoto (VPOP3) with POP3; Fri, 21 Dec 2001 04:31:0

[filmscanners] Fw: Re: filmscanners: iCorrect software

<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 14:16:36 EST To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_ea.1fda82a4.29539314_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 6.0 for Windows US sub 10536 X-Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-UIDL: _ry.ikjI8.sulphur S

[filmscanners] Re: Fw: Re: filmscanners: iCorrect software

>>I agree the plug-in seems the way to go, assuming the stand-alone software >>has the same feature set. After working a few times with the demo, >though., >>I question somewhat the wisdom of buying it at all. It works after a >>fashion, but not on all material and the results are here and there.

[filmscanners] RE: ADMIN: IMPORTANT re Filmscanners list

To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [filmscanners] ADMIN: IMPORTANT re Filmscanners list Please note that the Filmscanners list has today moved server. This should not affect you unduly, as an existing member - list mail should still be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] However there are some important changes. In

[filmscanners] Fw: RE: filmscanners: VueScan 7.3.7 Available

Mail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600. In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-UIDL: _zZC.nehI8.sulphur Subject: RE: filmscanners: VueScan 7.3.7 Available >&

[filmscanners] Re: filmscanners: Polaroid SS4000

Tony Sleep [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote on Fri, 21 Dec 2001 16:05:00 + >Do Powerbooks not take PCMCIA cards? I have an ancient IBM/Futuredomain >SCSI2 card which I use for scanners with my laptop PC when necessary, cost >me =$30US in GBP Yes, but... You need the Mac drivers, which is why I rec

[filmscanners] Fw: Re: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC

V5.50.4807.1700 X-Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-UIDL: _ESD.F7mI8.sulphur Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC Thanks - please keep us posted. Brian P. -- respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message --

[filmscanners] ADMIN: IMPORTANT re Filmscanners list

Please note that the Filmscanners list has today moved server. This should not affect you unduly, as an existing member - list mail should still be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] However there are some important changes. In summary:- - you may need to adjust your mail client if you use rules to sort

[filmscanners] Fw: Re: filmscanners: iCorrect software

meOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4807.1700 X-Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-UIDL: _RTD.XvjI8.sulphur Subject: Re: filmscanners: iCorrect software I haven't reviewed it, but I did read a review of it at http://www.luminous-landscape.com/icorrect.htm and Ian Lyon's review is at h

[filmscanners] Re: filmscanners: Polaroid SS4000

On Thu, 20 Dec 2001 21:03:02 -0500 Bernie Kubiak ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > The Polaroid SprintScan 4000 is an SCSI scanner. I have a G3 = > Powerbook > with firewire and USB only. Ah, sorry, I missed that. Do Powerbooks not take PCMCIA cards? I have an ancient IBM/Futuredomain SCSI2 ca

[filmscanners] Fw: Re: filmscanners: VueScan dust removal artifacts

3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 X-Envelope-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-UIDL: _lHC.uosI8.sulphur Subject: Re: filmscanners: VueScan dust removal artifacts This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

RE: filmscanners: Upgrading from NikonScan 2.5 to NikonScan 3.1

> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of > Julian Robinson > > In this case as Nikon advise, you do have to uninstall 2.5 > first and run > regsweep before installing ver 3. > > I did this with Win98-nearly-SE (Win98 non-SE with all > service packs) and > had no probs. In the case of a mi

RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC

> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Shunith Dutt > From: "Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)" > > environments. Having worked at Microsoft for six years I > know enough > > to be cynical about everything that they do. > > > Thought you folks might enjoy these: > > 2/ 'Think of thi

Re: filmscanners: Vuescan + Infrared

This is very interesting information. Does Canon's software work consistently in dust removal, or do they have the same problem? It does make some sense that the IR channel be refocused, since we know that IR light has a different focal point than does visible white light, and this is often indi

Re: filmscanners: iCorrect software

Reviews here: http://www.btinternet.com/~ian.lyons/icorrect/icorrect.htm http://server1.imaging-resource.com/SOFT/ICOR/ICOR.HTM http://www.luminous-landscape.com/icorrect.htm http://www.digitalproducer.com/2001/05_may/reviews/icorrect/icorrectpro.htm Given my respect for Mess'rs Lyons and Rei

Re: filmscanners: iCorrect software

I agree the plug-in seems the way to go, assuming the stand-alone software has the same feature set. After working a few times with the demo, though., I question somewhat the wisdom of buying it at all. It works after a fashion, but not on all material and the results are here and there. Also,

Re: filmscanners: Upgrading from NikonScan 2.5 to NikonScan 3.1

In this case as Nikon advise, you do have to uninstall 2.5 first and run regsweep before installing ver 3. I did this with Win98-nearly-SE (Win98 non-SE with all service packs) and had no probs. Julian At 17:19 20/12/01, you wrote: >I am upgrading the NikonScan software for my LS2000 from ve

Re: filmscanners: LS-20 problems

> My friend has a Nikon LS-20 and I'm wondering why she can't get the whole frame to scan (the vertical dimension get clipped about 1/8" on one side). This is with the standard Nikon software on a Mac G3. Also, she is having focus problems so is there a secret to using the manual focus adjus

Re: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC IMPORTANT

- Original Message - From: "James Grove" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 2:38 AM Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC IMPORTANT > You should always uninstall the Windows versions an

Re: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC

- Original Message - From: "Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2001 7:23 AM Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC > environments. Having worked at

Re: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC

Enoch Thanks for the feedback... Cheers... SD --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.307 / Virus Database: 168 - Release Date: 11/12/2001

Re: filmscanners: iCorrect software

I also recommend the plug-in version.  It supposedly is integrated with Photoshop's color management system. If you buy the download version, make sure you decline the $5US charge that would allow you to make additional downloads if you needed to (such as might happen in a bad computer crash).  Th

Re: filmscanners: SS120 and Kodachrome

The clue might be that the one you are having trouble with has a huge amount of color shift.  I don't know why that would keep any scanner software package from scanning the transparency so that it looked the same in Photoshop as the original. I assume you know how to set up Silverfast correctly.

Re: filmscanners: SS120 and Kodachrome

At 04:06 PM 12/19/01, Ian Lyons wrote: > > With Silverfast, the scans are so far off color-wise that it is > >> virtually impossible to correct, while with Insight, I was able to get > >> reasonably close with PS modifications. > > >Hmm, if SilverFast colour management is correctly configured you

RE: filmscanners: Sprintscan 4000 and Firewire/scsi adapter Anyone get this working under any version of Windows?

Ron,  We have done some testing and know the Microtech does NOT work reliability. The most compatible is the Adaptec but for the PC I STRONGLY recommend you purchase a inexpensive SCSI card such as the Adaptec 2906. David   -Original Message- From: Ron Erter [mailto:[EMAIL PROT

RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC

> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian > D. Plikaytis > > The site http://www.nikontechusa.com says this is for Windows > XP. Did you find that it improved your Win2K version's performance? It's only been 24 hours since I installed NikonScan NS) 3.12 so there's not enough mileage on i

Re: filmscanners: iCorrect software

If you put in "INTRODUCTION" as the code you get to buy the non-Pro version for $29.95. I just did. Don't be suckered into the extra $4.99 "multiple download fee" in case your download fails. I was. Read the form carefully - they pre-tick that box. IB At 23:48 19/12/01 +, you wrote:

RE: filmscanners: 35mm film versus medium-format scan quality (Ep

On Tue, 11 Dec 2001 17:43:25 +0100 Alessandro Pardi ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > why is that? I mean, that conventional test target images don't work > properly with digital systems? I was just wondering why nobody had come > up > yet with MTF tests for scanners. Once you can print a MTF targe

Re: filmscanners: scanning PAN-F (was: Polaroid Rebate)

On Fri, 14 Dec 2001 10:07:13 +1000 Rob Geraghty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > a few months later I can state that PAN-F scans a lot better, with > > respect > > to the D-Max problems, with my new Canon FS4000 (and latest Vuescan > > version). > > That says something very positive about the c

Re: filmscanners: Vuescan Strategy

On Thu, 13 Dec 2001 21:49:25 -0800 Robert E. Wright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Many of the recent suggestions make me question the strategy behind = > Vuescan. This is certainly up to Ed Hamrick, but my long time = > understanding has been that the aim was to create a scanned image file = > t

Re: filmscanners: Canoscan FS4000US

On Wed, 19 Dec 2001 00:23:39 -0600 (CST) patton paul ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I've also been looking at the > specs for the Nikon Coolscan IV and Minolta Dimage Scan Elite II. For > both these scanners, the dynamic range is calculated based on the A/D > conversion, which is 12 bits for t

Re: filmscanners: Vuescan - film types

On Wed, 12 Dec 2001 07:44:54 - P Elkin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > However I have had some trouble recently using Fuji Superia 400, S-400. > I am > finding the Super G 400 G2 profile is quite cold and I am having to use > the > Neutral setting instead of White Balance but it is often too

Re: filmscanners: SS120 and Kodachrome

Jeff, >> I have just started scanning some Kodachromes with the SS120, with >> disastrous results. I don't like Kodachrome but sometimes we must use what we are given. I spent a few hours this evening scanning Kodachrome on an SS120 with SilverFast IT8 and found NO problem. My Nikon scanner pr

Re: filmscanners: iCorrect software

I have only downloaded the demo but I would certainly get the plug-in: with the stand-alone you would have two procedures to do separately. With the plug-in you can make any adjustments you want first (levels, contrast or whatever) if you wish, run iCorrect as a filter, and then finish up imme

Re: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC IMPORTANT

So, does 3.1.2 run on Win98SE as well? Maris - Original Message - From: "Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 4:51 PM Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 Fo

Re: filmscanners: iCorrect software

iCorrect Professional, the Photoshop plugin is probably the better option as it provides more functionality than the iCorrect application, see: http://www.picto.com/icorrect/iCorrectCompare.htm BTW: you can (at least they tell me you can) get a discount (I think 10%) if you insert a promotiona

Re: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC IMPORTANT

> I made registry snapshots before and after installing NS version 3.12 > with ConfigSafe Complete Recovery 4.0. Examination of the keys that NS > uses shows no compelling reason to do that with this version. As I'm > very likely the only person on this list who's written an entire book on > the N

Re: filmscanners: SS120 and Kodachrome

In a message dated 12/19/2001 6:05:00 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I have just started scanning some Kodachromes with the SS120, with > disastrous results. I had previously scanned them on an Epson 1640 (which > I was using before the SS120) with default settings and got satisfactory,

RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC IMPORTANT

> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Grove > > You should always uninstall the Windows versions and also run > the regsweep utilitity in the Utils folder of that versions > download, then install the new version after reboot. I made registry snapshots before and after installing NS

Re: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC

7;s Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 6:50 AM Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Shunith Dutt > > Sent: Wednes

RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC IMPORTANT

- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...) Sent: 19 December 2001 19:23 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Shunith Dutt > mu

Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 focus/carriers

Nick, >> I have a problem with this (newish) scanner. In almost everything >> I've scanned so far I'm getting very patchy focus across the files. Strange and something that I have NOT noticed since I received my SS120 in April of this year. >> Anyone who has an SS120 will testify to the carri

Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 focus/carriers

In a message dated 12/19/2001 3:42:13 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Can't speak or Vuescan focus, never tried that feature but SilverFast for > the Polaroid scanners does NOT allow you to pick a focus point. VueScan doesn't allow you to pick a focus point either. The SS120 seems to use a

RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC

> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Shunith Dutt > must bookmark nikontech BTW... you mentioned ages ago > that you weren't having hassles on a dual processor after > doing a fresh install(am i right?) of w2k and then installing > NS just for your info... last week i reformatted a

Re: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 focus/carriers

Hi list I have a problem with this (newish) scanner. In almost everything I've scanned so far I'm getting very patchy focus across the files. I'm comparing the file sharpness with 35mm scans from my Nik LS200 and 120 scans from an old Minolta Dimage Scanmulti. The problem appears to be the fi

RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC

er to www.jgrove.dynodns.net -- James Grove [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.jamesgrove.co.uk www.mountain-photos.co.uk ICQ 99737573 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Shunith Dutt Sent: 19 December 2001 16:38 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: filmsca

Re: filmscanners: VueScan 7.3.6 Available

seems that i was fooled by the Adobe RGB/Apple RGB bug. Color spaces look like working ok now. Congratulations. I tested various settings: Result: if i set for monitor space the most proximate match to my image in pshop, then no matter what file space i choose, there is always a pretty good matc

Re: filmscanners: Vuescan + Infrared

In a message dated 12/18/2001 11:44:29 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Does Vuescan use the same technique with infrared passes on all scanners, Yes. > and therefore any difference between say an LS30 and FS4000 in the OEM > software are avoided. The problem with the FS4000 is that there

Re: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC

- Original Message - From: "Tom Scales" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 4:31 PM Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC > http://www.nikontechusa.com/ > > and Nikonscan 3.1.2 is lis

Re: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC

- Original Message - From: "Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 5:20 PM Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC > It's there. Honest i

Re: filmscanners: Canon D2400UF and Vuescan

In a message dated 12/19/2001 10:47:33 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > will this scanner ever be supported on Vuescan? This scanner uses the National Semiconductor LM983X chip to control the scanner. It turns out that this is very complex to program, and it will be at least a few months unt

Re: filmscanners: VueScan 7.3.5 color space bug?

> > I disagree ... what we end up with in Photoshop should never go thru the > "gamut funnel" you describe above. What we end up in Photoshop should be > the result of as few profile conversions as possible, and only one should be > needed ... i.e.: sorry, didnt i say that? device space = scan

RE: filmscanners: Small bug in VueScan 7.3.5

Ed writes ... > I just realized I have something backwards in VueScan 7.3.5. > The ICC profile for Adobe RGB has a gamma of 2.2 and > the ICC profile for Apple RGB has a gamma of 1.8. I had > this backwards in the code. > > I'll fix this in 7.3.6 in the next day or so. Sorry for the > inconveni

Re: filmscanners: Canoscan FS4000US

Hi Paul, There are a few people on this list who use the Canon FS4000, so hopefully someone will come to your aid soon. Your do have another option in a 4000 dpi 35mm scanner under $1000 US. That is the Polaroid SS4000, which is being offered in the $500-700 US range after rebate. Although i

RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC

> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Shunith Dutt > Sent: Wednesday, 19 December, 2001 01:52 > James/Enoch > > You know, i must have spent an hour hunting for it on the > Nikon sites... going in thru www.nikon.com and then following > links... on the us site (it's a black and white eff

Re: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC

http://www.nikontechusa.com/ and Nikonscan 3.1.2 is listed Tom - Original Message - From: "Shunith Dutt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 12:51 AM Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC >

Re: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC

James/Enoch You know, i must have spent an hour hunting for it on the Nikon sites... going in thru www.nikon.com and then following links... on the us site (it's a black and white effect) couldn't even find a link to support... on the uk site it was still 3.1.1... they're really strange a

Re: filmscanners: VueScan Histogram

Some lists generate a lot of sudden, surpise laughs. This list doesn't...till I saw this response to the "How is it calculated?" question. Ed..great response!!! Brad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > In a message dated 12/17/2001 10:46:16 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > writes: > > > How is t

Re: filmscanners: Album software

>> I want to print album pages. >> >> My ideal program will do the following >> >> 1)Allow me to drop a set of images onto a page . >> 6)Be dead easy to drive > >Adobe Illustrator does all the above and more. Not 100% sure that it meets requirement (6) above for people who are not g

Re: filmscanners: Album software

"Ian Boag" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "I want to print album pages. My ideal program will do the following: 1) Allow me to drop a set of images onto a page 2) Let me move, rotate and resize the images 3) Where they overlap, let me control which is on top 4) Give me precise positioning and size co

Re: filmscanners: Album software

Hi! You may check www.fotostation.com. Regards Erik Kaffehr tisdagen den 18 december 2001 20.33 skrev du: > I guess a lot of people with film scanners end up printing what they scan. > Maybe some even end up with the photos in an album sort of format. So > hopefully I won't be flamed out of

RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC

> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Grove > > V3.1.2 has been available in Japan for a week. The Driver > file for XP is the same as in previous versions but the Scan > software is different. Today it appeared without warning in > English on the Nikon USA Tech site. Specifically:

Re: filmscanners: Album software

Paint Shop Pro 7 has a facility called "print multiple images" that does most of what you require, but you'd have to create the captions as separate images using PSP7's text tool. - Original Message - From: Ian Boag <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2

RE: filmscanners: Vuescan hangs on scan on ss4000/win2k

I have the same issue. Preview works, but scan runs for about 10 minutes and then aborts. It appears the unit (SS4000) is repeatedly trying to focus but does not do so satisfactorily and keeps repeating the focus process. I am running WinXP and connecting via a SCSI. Version 7.1.25 works okay,

RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC

[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.jamesgrove.co.uk www.mountain-photos.co.uk ICQ 99737573 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Shunith Dutt Sent: 18 December 2001 18:36 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC

Re: filmscanners: Album software

> I guess a lot of people with film scanners end up printing what they scan. > Maybe some even end up with the photos in an album sort of format. So > hopefully I won't be flamed out of sight for wasting bandwith with OT stuff > > > I have a heap of images of different shapes ( I get carried

Re: filmscanners: Small bug in VueScan 7.3.5

On 12/18/01 1:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote: >I just realized I have something backwards in VueScan 7.3.5. >The ICC profile for Adobe RGB has a gamma of 2.2 and >the ICC profile for Apple RGB has a gamma of 1.8. I had >this backwards in the code. That was the guess in my e

Re: filmscanners: VueScan 7.3.5 color space bug?

In a message dated 12/18/2001 1:53:44 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Just please tell me that EktaspaceRGB came > direct from "device RGB" in a single conversion(?) That's correct. Regards, Ed Hamrick

RE: filmscanners: VueScan 7.3.5 color space bug?

sirius writes ... > ... > The scheme should be > scanner>scanner icm>vuescan interface space> monitor icm > monitor > and vuescan interface space> file icm > file > and then > file> file icm > pshop interface space (lab) > monitor icm > monitor > ... I disagree ... what we end up with in Photo

RE: filmscanners: VueScan 7.3.5 color space bug?

Ed writes ... > In a message dated 12/18/2001 11:51:45 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > ... > > The scheme should be ... > > That very well may be. However, it's probably more useful to > diagnose how it currently works before discussing how to > change it. > ... On my Win2k computer, dis

Re: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC

"James Grove" wrote to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:09 PM Subject: filmscanners: Nikon Scan V3.1.2 For Windows and MAC > Hi Folks, > > At last Nikon Scan V3.1.2 With XP Compatibility also for the MAC Where on earth did you find it? in the UK section 3.1.1 is st

Re: filmscanners: VueScan 7.3.5 color space bug?

There are no difference in my MAC between the scan window in Vuescan and later on in photoshop. Mikael Risedal -- >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: filmscanners: VueScan 7.3.5 color space bug? >Date: Tue, 18 Dec 20

Re: filmscanners: VueScan 7.3.5 color space bug?

In a message dated 12/18/2001 11:51:45 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > However i do get correct matching between pshop and vuescan when i set both > monitor and file space to adobe RGB. A more interesting question is whether you get correcting matching between VueScan and Photoshop when you

Re: filmscanners: VueScan 7.3.5 color space bug?

> It would be useful if someone could do this same test using > Photoshop on Windows. The Scan window in VueScan > should look very similar to the image in Photoshop. > > Regards, > Ed Hamrick > I did more or less, as told in a previous post.: i replace here part of my reply in your 7.3.5. ano

RE: filmscanners: VueScan 7.3.5 color space bug?

Ed writes ... > ... > This is just too complicated for me - there are lots of different color > space conversions, screen captures, Photoshop conversions, etc. It really isn't difficult. With regard to the color space you embed to the 'cropped' image, keep doing it like before. With regard t

Re: filmscanners: Bug in VueScan 7.3.4 Mac?

In a message dated 12/18/2001 9:29:36 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >I also noticed that everytime I launch Vs7.3.4, the left and the right > >panels quickly and very strangely blink twice one after the other as they > >appear. Never saw that before. Looks like some conflict. > > This

Re: filmscanners: VueScan 7.3.5 color space bug?

In a message dated 12/17/2001 11:46:30 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I have some sample images which demonstrate that 7.3.5 is actually worse > than 7.3.4, at least for the above combination of color spaces. > > This is

RE: filmscanners: Bug in VueScan 7.3.4 Mac?

>I've some problems with this new 7.3.4 version. >I'm running a G4/400 with 320Mo RAM, under system 9.1 (french) > >First, Vs crashed during my first experiments (I guess it freezed when I >typed my registr. number). Vuescan 7.3.4 now refuses to record it, so I get >the grey lines and feel so fru

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >