> -Original Message-
> From: David Gordon [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, August 13, 2001 11:21 PM
> To: Filmscanners
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: Good neg stck on Scanwit
>
> Oostrom, Jerry [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote on Mon, 13 Aug
> 2001 15
Oostrom, Jerry [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote on Mon, 13 Aug
2001 15:48:10 +0200
>Kodak Supra negative stock seems to scan with less
>grainy appearance than the Fuji Superia 400 film.
Maybe what Kodak claim is true then! The finest grained 400 neg film
available...
--
David Gordon
[EMAIL PROTECTED
What I have noticed with the scanwit 2720S and 400 ISO film may also be true
for 800 ISO film: the Kodak Supra negative stock seems to scan with less
grainy appearance than the Fuji Superia 400 film. This could however also be
the result of the slight overexposure I used for the Kodak film. Perhap
No, what I meant was - I can *easily* slap a good transparency in and then
print off a pin-sharp, grainless 11 x 8 at 300 dpi. But with a negative, I
would normally spend time ensuring the print was free of grain, by the
usual blurring of layers, etc etc. I agree that you can get very good 11
"Mark T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you have a 4000dpi scanner, probably. But I find with 2700 dpi, the
> grain-aliasing makes it harder to get good enlargements (8x10 and up) off
negs.
Really Mark? You can't get a good enlargement to A4 at 2700dpi?
That really surprises me - larger print
At 12:42 PM 7/08/01 +0700, Geoffrey wrote:
>I normally use trani stock but need to do some photography using neg film
>[35mm]
>and seek your opinion as to which neg films to use through an Acer
>Scanwit 2720s.
>
>I have a number of locations to film and will be shooting available
>light interiors
