on 3/14/01 4:00 PM, Tony Sleep at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001 09:08:20 +0100 Henk de Jong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I'm sure we're all using at least 1280X1024...
No, don't be too shure about that: I am working at 1024x768 on a 17" monitor
;-)
Huh. I'm currently
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001 09:08:20 +0100 Henk de Jong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I'm sure we're all using at least 1280X1024...
No, don't be too shure about that: I am working at 1024x768 on a 17" monitor
;-)
Huh. I'm currently working with Vuescan at 640x480 on a 10" monitor, since my
NEC
nal Message -
From: Hersch Nitikman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 10:29 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Idea
I may have known once, but I can't remember what a CLI is.
Hersch
I may have known once, but I can't remember what a CLI is.
Hersch
At 10:32 PM 03/07/2001 -0800, you wrote:
Jim Snyder wrote:
But, a properly designed program usually uses speed keys for the buttons
anyway, and location is not a concern. I have yet to meet many users that
don't
From: Hersch Nitikman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I may have known once, but I can't remember what a CLI is.
CLI = Command Line Interface
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Jules wrote:
is the prescan in NikonScan just a scan? it's seems awful fast, even
faster
than the fastest vuescan preview.
Scanwit's Mira Photo driver also uses a fast scan (at 300ppi) to show all
the frames in the film-holder. This has the advantage of allerting me to
"problem frames" that
Mike Kersenbrock wrote:
Jim Snyder wrote:
But, a properly designed program usually uses speed keys for the buttons
anyway, and location is not a concern. I have yet to meet many users that
don't recohgnize the efficiencies picked up by shortcuts, aliases, and speed
keys. Even the
Larry writes ...
What if you're sitting with a small pile of slides to scan, all
taken by
different people at different times?
...
This is an example of a situation, for which trying to make VS
easy to use, must drive Ed nuts. How to anticipate what is easy,
considering one user who
Frank Paris wrote:
I'm sure we're all using at least 1280X1024...
No, don't be too shure about that: I am working at 1024x768 on a 17" monitor
;-)
__
With kind regards,
Henk de Jong
The Netherlands
Email:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Homepage Nepal - Trekking Around Annapurna - Photo Gallery:
On Tuesday, March 06, shaf wrote:
I just had another idea for un-cluttering a tab window, possibly
removing entire tab. Since any session, is entirely dedicated to a
particular roll of film, why not move all concerns for film type to a
menu item?? There may be many "preferences, we'd
On Wednesday, March 07, shAf wrote:
Larry writes ...
What if you're sitting with a small pile of slides to scan, all
taken by
different people at different times?
This is an example of a situation, for which trying to make VS
easy to use, must drive Ed nuts. How to anticipate what is
In a message dated 3/7/2001 3:16:19 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This time you are wrong, Frank. I'm sure there are more than a couple of us
with 17" monitors. With a 17", anything over 800x600 is dysfunctional. I'm
happy for you that you have something larger, but please don't
I agree too.
- Original Message -
From: "IronWorks" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 7 March 2001 1:44
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Idea
I am for this.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 3/7/2001 3:16:03 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One of the keys to effective software design is to make the common
cases easy and the uncommon cases possible.
I completely agree with this. However, one person's logical grouping
of controls isn't logical to another
Eac I now have my test version of VueScan 7.0
When do you plan to release it at least to play
with?
Alex
What do people think of my putting options that affect the raw scan
in the Device tab, and other options in other tabs? I've been asked
several times in the past few days which options affect the raw scan,
and this seems like a logical way to organize things.
Sounds good to me!
__
From: "Frank Paris" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm sure we're all using at least 1280X1024 and so there is enough
real-estate so that the tabs won't overflow.
I use 1024x768.
This is the second message I have read in 3 minutes where the author, who
has probably never met any of the other Vuescan
In a message dated 3/7/2001 7:42:04 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When do you plan to release it at least to play
with?
Probably before this weekend.
Regards,
Ed Hamrick
From: Tim Victor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But the more typical case is working through a batch of a couple
of dozen pictures using the same settings.
And how do you know that is the more typical case? Maybe you are right, but
please point to the evidence that supports your assertion. Maybe Ed has a
"Hersch Nitikman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This time you are wrong, Frank. I'm sure there are more than a couple of
us
with 17" monitors. With a 17", anything over 800x600 is dysfunctional. I'm
happy for you that you have something larger, but please don't penalize
all
of us who don't have
In a message dated 3/7/2001 9:21:16 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I know Ed has stated in the past that most of the
reason for Vuescan's somewhat crowded interface is to fit it into a 640x480
screen.
I plan to continue making it useful on a 640x480 screen, but this is
quite a bit
shAF wrote, re Tabs:
Since any session, is entirely dedicated to a
particular roll of film
That's true for photographers with filmstrips, but not for archivers with
slides and/or negs from many shoots mixed together, nor for reflective
(flatbed) use which Vuescan also supports.
Can't
From: "shAf" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since any session, is entirely dedicated to a
particular roll of film, why not move all concerns for film type to a
menu item??
Not sure how you are able to make such a definitive statement. Almost all
of my scanning sessions involve scanning frames from various
: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Idea
Frank Paris wrote:
I'm sure we're all using at least 1280X1024...
No, don't be too shure about that: I am working at 1024x768 on a
17" monitor
;-)
__
With kind regards,
Henk de Jong
The Netherlands
Email:
[EMAIL PROT
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Geraghty
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 6:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Idea
"Hersch Nitikman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This time you are wrong, Frank. I'm sure there are more than a couple of
us
Lynn writes ...
shAF wrote, re Tabs:
Since any session, is entirely dedicated to a
particular roll of film
That's true for photographers with filmstrips, but not
for archivers with slides and/or negs from many shoots
mixed together, ...
I agree with you ... I should have
Tim wrote:
It would help my workflow considerably if I could answer email or write
invoices or whatever, rather than having to babysit the scanner for each
frame.
It would help everybody's, I'm sure. The solution is co-processors, which is
a hardware fix and not in Vuescan's purview. Amiga
I'm sure we're all using at least 1280X1024 and so there is enough
real-estate so that the tabs won't overflow.
When I read this, I thought it must be tongue in cheek.
Tim wrote:
One of the keys to effective software design is to make the common cases
easy and the uncommon cases possible.
That's well put, Tim, and it's beginning to happen, even.
In the rare case where someone gets stuck with a mixed batch of slides to
scan, they'd have waste an extra mouse
Ed wrote:
What do people think of my putting options that affect the raw scan in the
Device tab, and other options in other tabs? I've been asked several times
in the past few days which options affect the raw scan, and this seems like
a logical way to organize things.
Seems to me that that
Unfortunately I've never seen that one.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Tyson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 11:27 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Idea
| I should be happy to have a single group of tabs
the
program and are no longer potential customers.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Paris" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 12:33 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Idea
| I'm sure we're all using at least 1280X1
easier to remember where they are for all - rather than guessing what
might be the most or more 'common' way of using them.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 5:22 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Lynn Allen wrote:
Tim wrote:
It would help my workflow considerably if I could answer email or write
invoices or whatever, rather than having to babysit the scanner for each
frame.
It would help everybody's, I'm sure. The solution is co-processors, which is
Actually
Mike Kersenbrock wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, I was asked by one person to put the buttons at the top, above
the tabs. This ends up looking quite cluttered, and it's easy to press
a tab instead of a button, and vice versa. Putting the buttons at
the bottom and having the
It would help my workflow considerably if I could answer email or write
invoices or whatever, rather than having to babysit the scanner for each
frame.
It would help everybody's, I'm sure. The solution is
co-processors, which is
Actually the solution is not co-processors.
Most
From: "shAf" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I happen to believe VS's "raw scan" versus "subsequent crop"
philosophy is its greatest strength and what sets it apart form other
softwares. I believe you ought to emphasize this, and make it
conceptually easy to use, by keeping what addresses the raw scan
Rob Geraghty wrote:
anyone using vuescan would surely be using Photoshop or PSP, both of
which are unworkable in 640x480.
Unworkable? I'm using PS at 640 x 480 (and using Vuescan) and both work fine.
Colin Maddock
In a message dated 3/7/2001 12:05:50 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Main reason for it is the same reason that many "toolbars" in programs are
at the top just below the menus. The reason is mouse movement. If one
exclusively uses one set or the other as alternatives, then it doesn't
:55 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Idea
I've organized the tabs from left to right in the order that
they'll typically be used: Device, Crop, Process, Files,
Prefs, Preview (for image), Scan (for image). I'm going
to try to order the options within each tab in a way
In a message dated 3/7/2001 5:04:49 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This all sound marvelousbut does this mean my Prescan Window suggestion
didn't make the cut? Is there hope for this in the future? or is it just
too much programming.
Can you describe what you mean by a "Prescan"
Lynn wrote:
It would help everybody's, I'm sure. The solution is
co-processors, which is a hardware fix and not in
Vuescan's purview.
Amiga type coprocessing is no different from hardware acceleration on any
number of peripherals like graphic accelerator cards, DMA capable drives,
etc. Those
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 3:27 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Idea
In a message dated 3/7/2001 5:04:49 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This all sound marvelousbut does this mean my
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Idea
I'm sure we're all using at least 1280X1024 and so there is enough
real-estate so that the tabs won't overflow.
When I read this, I thought it must be tongue in cheek.
]]On Behalf Of IronWorks
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 9:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Idea
*We* may be but there are others out in this big wide world - many new to
scanning, to graphics. I'm sure there are those of us even besides Alan
Tyson who
Jules writes ...
is the prescan in NikonScan just a scan? it's seems awful fast,
even faster
than the fastest vuescan preview.
The "prescan" in NS simply measures the proper exposure, altho it
also measures the exposure during the "preview" (one of the
preferences). With Vuescan, the
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 5:27 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Idea
Can you describe what you mean by a "Prescan" tab again?
Is it basically the same thing as the "Sc
Ed: Taht works for me. i have not read the help file for some time and I am
sure that insruction iis in there. All I have to do is remember to click it back
on to get the output file.
Gordon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 3/7/2001 5:04:49 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jim Snyder wrote:
But, a properly designed program usually uses speed keys for the buttons
anyway, and location is not a concern. I have yet to meet many users that
don't recohgnize the efficiencies picked up by shortcuts, aliases, and speed
keys. Even the function keys can be programmed
Ed asks ...
I'm curious what people think of the idea of having
VueScan with one tab visible at a time (i.e. not having
one group of tabs on the right and the preview/scan
visible on the left, but instead one grouping of all
the tabs).
...
The problem with having the preview and scan
I like the idea of 1 set of tabs, the split always seemed unnatural to me.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 6:08 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Idea
I'm curious what people think of the idea of having
There's no particular reason to have two groups of tabs. This is completely
nonstandard. All tabs should be on the same property sheet.
Frank Paris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
I am for this.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 5:08 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Idea
| I'm curious what people think of the idea of having
| VueScan with one tab visible at a time (i.e. not
Ed writes ...
I'm curious what people think of the idea of having
VueScan with one tab visible at a time ...
... some thoughts ...
First, and I know I've said this before, but Vuescan's scan window
presents inaccurate color. Vuescan allows you to create RGB data for
every color
Frank writes ...
There's no particular reason to have two groups of tabs. This is
completely
nonstandard. All tabs should be on the same property sheet.
We could never make any inovative progress if we stayed with
"standards" :o) ... but I understand your gist, and from what I
gathered
ubject: Re: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Idea
Frank writes ...
There's no particular reason to have two groups of tabs. This is
completely
nonstandard. All tabs should be on the same property sheet.
We could never make any inovative progress if we stayed with
"standards&
Not necessarily true,
What if you're sitting with a small pile of slides to scan, all taken by
different people at different times?
Maybe a menu check box to save settings for the next scan, or revert to the
default settings between scans, with the default assignable. I have been
struggling
I should be happy to have a single group of tabs, provided
that you don't use the dreadful standard MS tab system,
where the tabs rotate apparently at random, so that I can't
remember which ones I've just looked at.
PS: I still remember love 'Vuescan Classic' where all
settings were visible on
- Original Message -
From: shAf [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 12:45 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Idea
Myself, I think I'd have a problem with not seeing the
controls
I'm presently using while I acquire subsequent
?u=62684
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alan Tyson
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2001 9:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Idea
I should be happy to have a single group of tabs, provided
60 matches
Mail list logo
