Thanks for the very informative evaluation, Dieder. I wonder -- since at
least one user found this to be a problem -- how did you find the
edge-of-frame sharpness to be when scanning at 4000dpi? Is shallow depth of
field truly an issue with this scanner? I'm about to purchase one, so I'm
especiall
Dieder writes ...
> ...
>
> A few comments about NikonScan 3.0.
> ---
>
> I am impressed at the accuracy of the colour that is
> available now. ...
Which color spaces are you scanning into? Which "wide gamut" color
spaces does NS3 offer??
shAf :o)
Andy Adler wrote:
>
> Thanks for the very informative evaluation, Dieder. I wonder -- since at
> least one user found this to be a problem -- how did you find the
> edge-of-frame sharpness to be when scanning at 4000dpi? Is shallow depth of
> field truly an issue with this scanner? I'm about to p
>Additional features about NikonScan that I haven't investigated
>thoroughly yet are the 'Grain reduction algorithm' and the
>'restoration of colour algorithm'. I hope I don't need to explore the
>'ROC' for a while yet...it'd be somewhat alarming if 2-10 yr old negs
>that have been properly s
Jack writes ...
> ...
> It is amazing what Digital ROC can do for under
> and over exposed images!
> Scenes with washed our color come alive! They don't
> have to be old and faded, but when they are,
> the color comes back better than the original.
> The color appears more accurate also. Try it.
- Original Message -
From: "shAf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 1:59 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon 4000 ED Review Part III
> What's the deal with ICE^3 support for the new Nikon scanners only??
> If Niko
Jules writes ...
> - Original Message -
> From: "shAf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ...
> > What's the deal with ICE^3 support for the new Nikon scanners
only??
> > If Nikon offers NS3 for the LS-2000, why not offer the full
deal???
>
> i'd love to get ICE^3 for my LS-2000. it's typical for com
From: "shAf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> What's the deal with ICE^3 support for the new Nikon scanners only??
> If Nikon offers NS3 for the LS-2000, why not offer the full deal???
>
> shAf :o)
One would think that Nikon would at least offer ICE^3 as an upgrade for a
fee for the LS 2000 and LS 30 o
idea to me.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: shAf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 3:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon 4000 ED Review Part III
Jack writes ...
> ...
> It is amazing what Digital ROC can
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2001 10:58 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon 4000 ED Review Part III
> >hello again Jack :o)
> >
> > What's the deal with ICE^3 support for the new Nikon scanners only??
> >If Nikon offers NS3 for the LS-2000, why no
In a message dated 4/24/2001 3:50:37 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> For the same reason that Epson hasn't updated the drivers for the Epson
> Stylus Pro, or that MS stopped upgrading Win 95. This biz is more about
> moving people to the next generation of devices, not to fix the errors
>> What's the deal with ICE^3 support for the new Nikon scanners only??
>> If Nikon offers NS3 for the LS-2000, why not offer the full deal???
>
>
>> shAf :o)
>
For the same reason that Epson hasn't updated the drivers for the Epson
Stylus Pro, or that MS stopped upgrading Win 95. T
Ed writes ...
> To Nikon's credit, they did support the LS-30 and LS-2000 in
> NikonScan 3.0. This not only makes for happier customers (and
> word of mouth from happy customers is a powerful marketing
> technique) but it also reduces their support load (assuming there
> are fewer bugs in NikonS
13 matches
Mail list logo
