RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000: An Unbiased Review

2001-06-26 Thread Austin Franklin
* overall, excellent scans, especially on 645 negatives. Quality on par with the Leaf 45, maybe even marginally better. (Sorry, Austin.) If I were the Leaf designer, I'd take that as a compliment! For a 12 year old design, it does hold its own, and if I had to do it all over again, I'd

RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000: An Unbiased Review

2001-06-26 Thread Lawrence Smith
Rafe, What are your other settings for the 5 minute scans? I find that a 16x multisample, 14bit, ICE normal scan of a 645 transpanency takes about 20-25 mintues Lawrence * Fast. 645 scans w/o ICE in about 5 minutes. (on Athlon 700 MHz machine with 512 MB RAM) Add about 50% more

RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000: An Unbiased Review

2001-06-26 Thread Wilson, Paul
Title: RE: filmscanners: Nikon 8000: An Unbiased Review I also have an LS8000. I got it a week ago and was having the banding problem (as well as AF and various other problems). The super fine CCD mode did fix it but not I'm not having the problem even though I'm not using super fine CCD mode