I don't think it makes any difference but I had mine on its side, and
now I have put it the logo way up.
--
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.jamesgrove.co.uk
www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Mark O
"Mark Otway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The latter would suit my desk layout better, but will it affect the
> scanner's performance in any way? Is there an optimal position, or will
> it make no difference?
My LS30 has been lying on its side for about a year now. It works fine.
One possible ad
Rob Geraghty schrieb:
> "Mark Otway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The latter would suit my desk layout better, but will it affect the
> > scanner's performance in any way? Is there an optimal position, or will
> > it make no difference?
>
> My LS30 has been lying on its side for about a year
No difference in performance or scan quality.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Otway" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:03 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Nikon Coolscan IV - positioning
|
| Hi all,
|
| Quick, and possibly dumb, question:
Ralf wrote:
> I have encountered one serious drawback as to operating my
> LS-30 "flat": When using the film strip holder (the tiny
> metal-plastic thing, not the motor-driven feeder), the focus
> would be inaccurate, apparently as a result of the oscillating
> scanner movement.
Well, that surpri
