I owns a LS-30 and IMHO the ICE is something
extremely useful .
I think Canon is missing ICE.
Sincerely.
Ezio
www.lucenti.com e-photography
site
- Original Message -
From:
Jan
Copier
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 18, 2000 4:26
PM
Based on what I found when I asked the same question, you will receicve
answers from people who selected and have used only the LS-30, some who
have only used the Canon, and a third group who have tested or compared
both. It really comes down to what you want to spend in $$$, the
bits/channel and
I own a
2710 and didn't buy the LS-30 because of the price differential at the
time.
IIRC, it
was $cdn880 vs $cdn1300-1700 (there were two Nikon's that were $cdn 500 apart I
don't recall which one was the LS-30), and it came with PhotoShop LE, which I
would have needed on the Nikon side (si
Both are good scanners. I originally planned to buy a LS30 due to the Nikon
name and reputation but ended up buying the Canon FS2710.
My retailer had all three (Nikon, Canon and Minolta) and let me take them home
to compare. I didn't find enough difference between the Nikon and Canon to
justif
> I'm planning to buy a new scanner, my old one is a Nikon LS20.
>
> Can anyone tell me what is the best choice, the Nikon LS30 or =
> CanoScan2710?
You seem to have posted this several times, and to have received responses.
BTW, please turn off HTML posting in your mail client.
Regards
Tony
07 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: NikonLS30 or CanoScan2710?
> > I'm planning to buy a new scanner, my old one is a Nikon LS20.
> >
> > Can anyone tell me what is the best choice, the Nikon LS30 or =
> > CanoScan2710?
>
> You seem to have posted this several times, and
> I'm not aware any problem sending mail more then once and do not know where
> to solve this, if nessecary may be you can help.
Sorry, I wrote that before I had noticed that Majordomo was apparently having a bad
day
and had distributed several messages more than once. A glitch with the listser
