-times better than one a machine decides for
itself.
Best regards--LRA
--Original Message--
From: "Oostrom, Jerry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: May 1, 2001 7:16:12 AM GMT
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Noi
I have used a HP s20 myself, and I found this feature very useful.
> I noticed that the HP S20 software was able to paint e.g. in red all pixels
> that were being clipped by current histogram mapping settings. To me this
> seemed a handy feature, but no other software took over that idea.
Beautiful reply with masterful selection of original text serves to prove
your and my point!
;-)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 10:34 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: N
In a message dated 5/1/2001 5:06:45 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Ed, if you're listening, when are you going to at least tell us
> you're *thinking about* separating the grain reduction and dust/scratch
> algorithms? :)
I haven't thought about the implications of this yet. I'm up to
At 09:16 AM 1/05/01 +0200, Jerry wrote:
>..
>I noticed that the HP S20 software was able to paint e.g. in red all pixels
>that were being clipped by current histogram mapping settings. To me this
>seemed a handy feature, but no other software took over that idea.
>It seems that if you can show the
In a message dated 5/1/2001 2:20:15 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> This reminded me that I should put only one question in a mail (ironically
> that was even Ed's suggestion to me, even longer ago),
Yes, this maximizes the chances that someone will answer the
question. I learned long ago
I already asked this question to Ed and later to this list, all some time
ago. Ed replied that his algorithms were "of course" already doing such a
thing. Then I asked, where can you set the threshold on black (slides) or
white (negs) for what is considered to be dust and waited... (no answer to
t
.
Fire up an old copy of qbasic or something; this stuff is pretty easy to
mess around with.
-R
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=115567
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lynn Allen
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 10:36 AM
To: [EMAI
Lynn Allen writes ...
> Ryan wrote:
>
> > How does a computer know that the blue in your
> > picture is from the sky? Or that the red in your
> > picture is a sunset and not a sportscar? :-)
>
> ...
>
> I believe it has to do with matrixes, which I don't pretend to
understand,
> on the programmi
Ryan wrote:
>How does a computer know that the blue in your picture is from the sky? Or
that the red in your picture is a sunset and not a sportscar? :-)
I'll give a serious answer to a humorous question--if I may deviate from my
usual pathways. ;-)
I believe it has to do with matrixes, which
"Lynn Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since dust is always "white" on negs and always "black" on slides, while
> "noise" is usually lighter and "grain" is usually darker than the
> surrounding field of pixels, is this or can it be considered in the
cleaning
> algorithms?
If you could characte
> This suddenly seems so obvious as I experience the problems more, and I
> wonder what I'm missing that it isn't more easy to deal with. (?) Example:
> red pixels in sky colors, when it isn't sunset, green pixels in skin-tones
How does a computer know that the blue in your picture is from the sk
12 matches
Mail list logo
