Re: filmscanners: OT-ish Epson 1270, was Repro house..

2001-03-28 Thread Derek Clarke
Photo Glossy Film used to be the premier product in the range, but I'm not so sure these days. It's officially rated only capable of 720dpi I believe. I really like Premium SemiGloss paper and Heavyweight Matte myself. I tried both of these on an Epson 890 I had briefly , but haven't got

Re: filmscanners: OT-ish Epson 1270, was Repro house..

2001-03-27 Thread Arthur Entlich
Before we get into a "does not" "does too" fight over the archival nature of the 870/890 1270/1290 inks, it should be noted that although the inks have reasonable lightfast-ness, they are vulnerable to ozone and other pollutants, which are responsible for the "cyan to orange" fading problems.

Re: filmscanners: OT-ish Epson 1270, was Repro house..

2001-03-27 Thread Arthur Entlich
Regarding output prints from Epson printers for consideration as material for color separations, today I took a closer look at some samples of the same image printed on Epson Glossy film versus Premium Glossy Photo Paper and Photo Glossy Paper. Although the difference is not huge, the glossy

Re: filmscanners: OT-ish Epson 1270, was Repro house..

2001-03-27 Thread Rob Geraghty
"Arthur Entlich" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Glossy Photo Paper and Photo Glossy Paper. Although the difference is not huge, the glossy film did provide better detail and deeper, less posterized, color. (the samples were printed with Photo 700/750 models). I'll have to try it again on the

Re: filmscanners: OT-ish Epson 1270, was Repro house..

2001-03-27 Thread Tony Sleep
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 00:29:32 -0800 Arthur Entlich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: today I took a closer look at some samples of the same image printed on Epson Glossy film versus Premium Glossy Photo Paper and Photo Glossy Paper. Thanks Art. Damn, more tests. Regards Tony Sleep

Re: filmscanners: OT-ish Epson 1270, was Repro house..

2001-03-27 Thread Chris Hargens
or example, is the usual image size for a print on A4 paper? Does it vary much? Chris Hargens -Original Message- From: Tony Sleep [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Monday, March 26, 2001 8:56 AM Subject: RE: filmscanners: OT-ish Epson 1270, was Repro house.. On M

Re: filmscanners: OT-ish Epson 1270, was Repro house..

2001-03-27 Thread Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
D] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 9:43 AM Subject: Re: filmscanners: OT-ish Epson 1270, was Repro house.. | Just what size is are A4 and A3 prints? Also, I should note that I've often | heard/read people remark that they can print off scanned images up to such | and such size (e.g., 11"x14&quo

RE: filmscanners: OT-ish Epson 1270, was Repro house..

2001-03-27 Thread Shough, Dean
A4 is 8.3" x 11.7" A3 is 11.7" x 16.5" For size (and weights) of paper in other sizes try http://www.tssphoto.com/sp/dg/weight.html (also a good site for printer info and output comparison).

RE: filmscanners: OT-ish Epson 1270, was Repro house..

2001-03-27 Thread Frank Paris
/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Chris Hargens Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 7:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Chris Hargens Subject: Re: filmscanners: OT-ish Epson 1270, was Repro house.. Just what size is are A4 and A3 pr

Re: filmscanners: OT-ish Epson 1270, was Repro house..

2001-03-27 Thread Arthur Entlich
Rob Geraghty wrote: "Arthur Entlich" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Glossy Photo Paper and Photo Glossy Paper. Although the difference is not huge, the glossy film did provide better detail and deeper, less posterized, color. (the samples were printed with Photo 700/750 models). I'll

Re: filmscanners: OT-ish Epson 1270, was Repro house..

2001-03-27 Thread Chris Hargens
Thanks everyone for the quick and specific replies. Chris Hargens -Original Message- From: Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 7:51 PM Subject: RE: filmscanners: OT-ish Epson 1270, was Repro house.. With 50 messages still

RE: filmscanners: OT-ish Epson 1270, was Repro house..

2001-03-26 Thread Tony Sleep
On Mon, 26 Mar 2001 13:45:20 +1000 Rob Geraghty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Obscanning: I have yet to try printing at A3, but do those who have printed at A3 from 2700dpi scans find the scanning resolution adequate? Back to back comparisons here between A4 1200 prints of 2700 4000ppi scans

Re: filmscanners: OT-ish Epson 1270, was Repro house..

2001-03-26 Thread John Bradbury
" John Bradbury - Original Message - From: Mark Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 9:51 PM Subject: RE: filmscanners: OT-ish Epson 1270, was Repro house.. While on this off-topic :), are many of you using the (dreaded!?) 870/1270 Epsons in a

RE: filmscanners: OT-ish Epson 1270, was Repro house..

2001-03-25 Thread Mark Thomas
While on this off-topic :), are many of you using the (dreaded!?) 870/1270 Epsons in a semi-pro or pro role, and have you or clients experienced those fading problems? I want to move to A3 width, and can't afford much more than the 1270.. Yes, I realise this is slipping off-topic, but my

RE: filmscanners: OT-ish Epson 1270, was Repro house..

2001-03-25 Thread Rob Geraghty
Mark wrote: I want to move to A3 width, and can't afford much more than the 1270.. You might want to give serious consideration to an Epson 1160. I bought one just recently. You can fit them with a CIS which makes ink costs much lower (I can't afford one at this stage with the AUD so low