I am using PEC-12 with PEC PADS on "dirty" negs as a first step.
I found an anti-static brush (StaticMaster) which is plutonium charged. It
seems to work well on my neg strips. But, I was wondering if anyone had any
comments on if it is a gimmick (any soft brush would work) I assume the
plutonium
Frank Nichols wrote:
>
> I am using PEC-12 with PEC PADS on "dirty" negs as a first step.
>
> I found an anti-static brush (StaticMaster) which is plutonium charged.
Just for clarity, its polonium, not plutonium... I don't think there is
a safe qty of plutonium...:-)
Isaac
It
> see
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 6:32 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: On dust
| I am using PEC-12 with PEC PADS on "dirty" negs as a first step.
|
| I found an anti-static brush (StaticMaster) which is plutonium charged. It
| seems to work well
OTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: On dust
Frank Nichols wrote:
>
> I am using PEC-12 with PEC PADS on "dirty" negs as a first step.
>
> I found an anti-static brush (StaticMaster) which is plutonium charged.
Just for clarity, its polonium, not plutonium... I don't thin
Frank Nichols wrote:
> I am using PEC-12 with PEC PADS on "dirty" negs as a first step.
>
> I found an anti-static brush (StaticMaster) which is plutonium charged. It
> seems to work well on my neg strips. But, I was wondering if anyone had any
> comments on if it is a gimmick (any soft brush
This may be slightly OT, but I had to respond. In short, most of what
you "know" about plutonium is BS. Plutonium in small quantities is no
more dangerous than other radioactive substances. That "one atom"
nonsense is pure hype, invented by those with various
political/economic/social agendas.
e/AEI/may95/plutonium_eff.html
http://www.americanscientist.org/issues/sciobs95/sciobs95-03.html
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 12:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: On dust
I think we've had this argument before, about two years ago.
Perhaps it is true that Plutonium is not as risky as once reported, but
individual response to ionizing radiation is just that, and therefore a
relative unknown, so I prefer to err on the side of caution, and would
recommend others do
