Peter -
I believe the polaroid scanners are made by microtek - so the
financial aspect of your decision (if you are concerned with
polaroid going belly up) could be removed by changing the name
plate.
__
Gordon Potter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Nashville, TN 37215
USA
>
Buy the SS120. I have one and I like it. The Nikon is probably a fine scanner if you could find one, but is reported to have problems keeping medium format film in focus at the edges due to the type of light source it uses, which also evidently accentuates dust which means you need to use ICE wit
I'm not sure what this means exactly. Are you suggesting the person but
a Microtek version of the SS4000, or that if Polaroid should disappear,
a person could "change name plates" and attempt to get a warranty repair
through Microtek?
The SS4000 and Microtek version have different bodies, so it
ECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 5:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Scanner Buying Dilemma
I'm not sure what this means exactly. Are you suggesting the person but
a Microtek version of the SS4000, or that if Polar
rom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Hayward @
> Hopco
> Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 2:10 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: Scanner Buying Dilemma
>
>
> IF Polaroid should file for chapter 11, and the scanner divis
From: "Gregory Georges" (snipped)
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Scanner Buying Dilemma
> But, at the price of the 4000, you just can't go wrong.
> It is a great scanner and there are lots of helpful users around to answer
> questions. By th
Oops, ..."negatives and scans" should be "negatives and slides".
Sorry about that.
Peter
ven't.
Art
Peter wrote:
>
> From: "Gregory Georges" (snipped)
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: filmscanners: Scanner Buying Dilemma
> > But, at the price of the 4000, you just can't go wrong.
> > It is a great scanner and there are lots
