Bruce
If you haven't already, I suggest you read Dane Kosaka's step by step guide to
scanning Kodachromes with Nikon scanners using Nikonscan software:
http://www.marginalsoftware.com/LS2000Notes/casestudyI/scanning_kodachrome_on_th
e_nikon_caseI.htm
Most of what Dane recommends can be done with
In a message dated 7/26/2001 2:21:09 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I am using VueScan 7.1.7 on a PC with an LS30. What is the generally
> accepted best method for scanning these? Is use of the infrared channel
> out? If it is better to use Nikon Scan 3.1 on these I can.
VueScan's infrar
> If you haven't already, I suggest you read Dane Kosaka's step by step
> guide to
> scanning Kodachromes with Nikon scanners using Nikonscan software:
>
http://www.marginalsoftware.com/LS2000Notes/casestudyI/scanning_kodachro
me
> _on_th
> e_nikon_caseI.htm
Thanks, I will read that with great in
Are you sure the image size isn't 28x28mm?
Those slides sound like 126 (the original Instamatic format) to me.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] () wrote:
> In a message dated 7/26/2001 2:21:09 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > I am using VueScan 7.1.7 on a PC with an LS30. What is the generally
> > ac
How about that old Kodak favorite (??), 126 Instamatic? If I remember
correctly, they were square negatives.
Bob Reilly
> I'm perplexed by the image size of your slides. 22mm square might be
from
> a
> Robot camera? But you imply the image is too wide to scan -- have you
> mixed up
> your millim
I would be sure to clean them with PEC-12 or other film cleaner first.
Use of the infrared channel is not out of the question - use it. The report
from their representative to this list was that they found that *sometimes*
ICE doesn't work on Kodachrome, so rather than field customer complaints
In a message dated 7/26/2001 2:21:09 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>They are a square image measuring about 22mm on a side. This pretty
>much buggers me for scanning the whole image but the owner of the
>slides (family!) don't mind if I forcibly have to crop due to the
>scanners limitations
David Hoffman wrote:
> I expect Ed is right & these are Instamatic format. If they are 22mm
> square then they should fit your scanner fine as 35mm is larger at 24
> mm x 36 mm but I have a vague memory that Instamatic was 40mm x 40mm
> which would explain your difficulty.
Here are some frame siz
