I was actually going to write you regarding this feature. I have a the
Dimage Scan Elite. In several of the versions, I think during the early
part of this year, it worked great. On later versions, I get problems with
odd coloration. I know there were a few versions when this code was being
op
he best of both worlds.
Registration will unlock all of them.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Greenbank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 5:33 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: VueScan Long Exposure Pass
|
| - Original Me
Steve writes ...
> OK ed I've coughed upo my $40 as I can't get Siverfast to behave
> but I am less than convinced that long exposure isn't a useful
option.
>
> I've redone my tests and you can see the results at (refresh if
necessary) :
> ...
You can keep your existing installation of Vuesc
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: VueScan Long Exposure Pass
> In a message dated 5/4/2001 11:06:17 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
>
> > What about a
Hi Ed!
I did use Long Exposure Pass on some slides with an extreme dynamic range. To
me it seemed to work, although I'm pretty certain that I was loosing some
sharpness.
Best regards
Erik
On Friday 04 May 2001 11:18, you wrote:
> Would anyone object if I removed the Long exposure pass
> opt
In a message dated 5/4/2001 11:06:17 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
> What about a slightly underexposed slide (this can produce a better result
> when projected). I assume the long exposure would help.
VueScan already automatically lengthens the exposure to maximize
the intensity of the s
On Fri, 4 May 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Would anyone object if I removed the Long exposure pass
> option from VueScan? It seems to have problems on most
> scanners with CCD charge bleeding from overexposed pixels,
> and it does more harm than good (in my opinion).
Ed, did you ever add the
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: VueScan Long Exposure Pass
> The problem with the Long exposure pass option is that most people won't
> see the problem area
> I believe some scanners (SS4000/A4000T) do not position themselves too
well
> for multipass - so this is of limited use. I just tried 8x MP with the
> artixscan 4000 and there are echos in the image. The result is pretty
> useless.
I just tried 8x with long exposure (for completeness) and there
Is the long exposure pass built in or is there an option? The
reason I ask is that Vuescan seems to take longer to scan an image
than the Epson Twain (Epson 1640). There is, however, far better
density range using Vuescan (color slides) and I do not get the
predominant posterization in greens th
Hi, Ed!
I guess that I don't mind, either...
I'd actually had SOME success with it on my Scan Multi II, but also some
failures...
I'll keep a couple copies of the last few versions around just in case I
ever want to use it again!!
Thanx again for a great product and great support!!
Guy Clark
Ed wrote:
>The problem with the Long exposure pass option is that most people won't
see the problem areas until they've scanned hundreds of slides.
>Any area where there's a large bright-dark transition will have problems.
Boy, that's "strewth!" And I thought the problem was just with Scanwit
(
No objection here.
Maris Lidaka
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 4:18 AM
Subject: filmscanners: VueScan Long Exposure Pass
| Would anyone object if I removed the Long exposure pass
| option from VueScan? It seems to hav
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would anyone object if I removed the Long exposure pass
> option from VueScan?
No objection from me, although it was an interesting idea.
Requires less patience than 8x multipass. :)
Rob
>The problem with the Long exposure pass option is that most people won't
>see the problem areas until they've scanned hundreds of slides.
>
>Any area where there's a large bright-dark transition will have problems.
>You might try zooming into the image at this point.
Thanks for the warning! I'l
Ed: I assume that the long exposure pass would be replaced by having
the scanner do 4 scanning passes. I found that the long pass reduced
the number of times that I had to do multiscanning to pull detail from
the shadows. I would only use the long scan option if I needed to get
that detail, oth
In a message dated 5/4/2001 7:36:20 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I have a Minolta Scan Multi and don't seem to be having any problems with
> it. I have just started scanning a batch of slides that were taken in
> Lower Antelope Canyon and which have lots of dark shadows and black areas
>Would anyone object if I removed the Long exposure pass
>option from VueScan? It seems to have problems on most
>scanners with CCD charge bleeding from overexposed pixels,
>and it does more harm than good (in my opinion).
I think I would but I haven't scanned enough images with Vuescan 7.0 yet
This may be a problem only on the LS-2000 and Minolta Dimage for now:
>From Ed's Help files:
"On the Nikon LS-2000 and the Minolta Dimage film scanners, this option
causes each scan line to be read N times before advancing to the next scan
line. On other scanners, the whole image is read N time
19 matches
Mail list logo
