Leisure Publishing Company
540-989-6138
--
From: Lynn Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 13:29:39 -0400 (EDT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: What is 4,000 scanner quality like in practice.
7.50 per drum-scan is a bit pricey,
Director
Leisure Publishing Company
540-989-6138
--
From: Lynn Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 13:29:39 -0400 (EDT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: What is 4,000 scanner quality like in practice.
7.50 per drum-scan is a bit
On Thu, 24 May 2001 20:19:20 -0700 Arthur Entlich ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
or you wouldn't see the incredible amounts of stock
and cash transfers as smaller agencies ar being swallowed up by the
likes of Bill Gates (Corbis) and Getty Industries.
Hm. Much more to do with their big
On Thu, 24 May 2001 15:42:06 EDT ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Whenever I've mentioned 50Mb drum scans at $10 on the Stockphoto list
I've had lots of people ask where?.
And the answer is?? :-)
The going rate in London is 25-35GBP+17.5%VAT, about $45-65US equivalent!
Regards
Tony Sleep
On Thu, 24 May 2001 19:08:51 -0400 Ray Amos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
In my opinion, Nikon has
really improved the digital ice feature. I cannot tell any difference
in sharpness using and not using digital ice cubed even when zoomed
side-by-side until you could see the pixels.
If it is
On Wed, 23 May 2001 17:51:42 EDT ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
If I got a 4000 desktop scanner of my own it would need to produce
about ten fully finished scans per hour to be worth considering. Is
this possible considering the amount of time that dust busting might
take?
IME with the
]]
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 8:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: What is 4,000 scanner quality like in
practice.
On Wed, 23 May 2001 17:51:42 EDT ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
If I got a 4000 desktop scanner of my own it would need to produce
about ten fully finished scans
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: What is 4,000 scanner quality like in
practice.
Actually, Nikon has the Coolscan 8000, and Polaroid is now also shipping
(it's name escapes me) a medium format, 4000 dpi scanner. The Nikon has the
ASF ICE^3 suite.
Pat
- Original Message -
From
E-Cost is showing both the Nikon 8000 and Polaroid 120 in their product list.
Jim
Tony Sleep wrote:
On Wed, 23 May 2001 20:04:57 -0500 Laurie Solomon ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
I believe you may be mistaken or misinformed. The new 4000 ppi
scanners are
35mm film scanners and not
--Original Message--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tony Sleep)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: May 24, 2001 12:18:00 PM GMT
Subject: Re: filmscanners: What is 4,000 scanner quality like in practice.
On Wed, 23 May 2001 17:51:42 EDT ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
If I got a 4000 desktop scanner
Dear Lalle
Converting to dollar sums for universal simplicity. UK prices for system
time vary between $75 - $125. Apparently New York is slightly cheaper than
even the UK provinces.
If I get a 120 scanner I will also need a Computer to plug it into, a table
to put it on and by many
Paul Chefurka wrote:
If I got a 4000 desktop scanner of my own it would need to produce
about ten fully finished scans per hour to be worth considering. Is
this possible considering the amount of time that dust busting might
take?
IME with the Polaroid 4000, absolutely not. I achieve
On Wed, 23 May 2001 17:51:42 EDT ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
If I got a 4000 desktop scanner of my own it would need to produce
about ten fully finished scans per hour to be worth considering. Is
this possible considering the amount of time that dust busting might
take?
IME with
Bob makes many reasonable points, in terms of the real time costs of
film scanning. It is not a greatly differing argument from that of
whether photographers should waste their time in the darkroom have
someone else do it for them.
To some extent the scan produced by the photographer has the
--
From: Lynn Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 13:29:39 -0400 (EDT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: What is 4,000 scanner quality like in practice.
7.50 per drum-scan is a bit pricey,
Lynn Allen wrote:
As a former Art Director, I don't think that Stock is an appropriate
medium--it never was for my uses. Almost is not good enough in today's
competition to stake one's career on. You
need a photographer you know, who can get the results you need. While
stock
Director
Leisure Publishing Company
540-989-6138
--
From: Lynn Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 24 May 2001 13:29:39 -0400 (EDT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: What is 4,000 scanner quality like in
practice.
7.50 per drum-scan
:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: What is 4,000 scanner quality like in
practice.
On Wed, 23 May 2001 20:04:57 -0500 Laurie Solomon ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
I believe you may be mistaken or misinformed. The new 4000 ppi
scanners are
35mm film scanners and not medium
Actually, Nikon has the Coolscan 8000, and Polaroid is now also shipping
(it's name escapes me) a medium format, 4000 dpi scanner. The Nikon has the
ASF ICE^3 suite.
Pat
- Original Message -
From: Laurie Solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I believe you may be mistaken or misinformed. The
19 matches
Mail list logo
