> Negative film made into prints which was exposed to tungsten lighting,
> without correction would come out "lemon yellow"
What about B&W negative film or tungsten color film?
;-)
Negative film made into prints which was exposed to tungsten lighting,
without correction would come out "lemon yellow" since tungsten lighting
is indeed quite lacking in the blues due to having a much lower Kelvin
temperature than true daylight.
During printing (through photographic means) the n
On Wed, 25 Jul 2001 01:36:25 +0200 Tomasz Zakrzewski ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> But are there any ISO 800 tungsten negs on the market?
> They would be great for my stage photography but unfortunately none are
> available.
> I can't use the blue filter either as at ISO 800 I sometimes get onl
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001 15:17:07 -0700 (PDT) Robert Meier
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> The best thing is still to use corresponding film or a correction
> filter to do a rough correction. Otherwise, some of the film layers
> will be underexposed. Which ones depends on the light source. The rest
PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2001 9:58 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: artificial light
| Thomaz:
|
| Tungsten light is always "warmer" by several Kelvins than natural light,
as
| you know. If you can't buy film rated for tungsten light (and I&
Robert Meier wrote:
> The best thing is still to use corresponding film or a correction
> filter to do a rough correction. Otherwise, some of the film layers
> will be underexposed.
Yes, I know that. But are there any ISO 800 tungsten negs on the market?
They would be great for my stage photograph
Tony Sleep wrote:
> > How filmscanners get away with negatives exposed in tungsten halogen
> > light?
> > Is it
> > coorrectable
> > as in standard photographic process?
>
> Yes, only better. And flourescents. Wonderful! :)
Really good news! :-)
Tomasz Zakrzewski
___
--- Tony Sleep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> new flatbed I noticed that a
> frame
> > exposed
> > in tungsten lighting is totally lemon yellow on the scan. Is it
> > coorrectable
> > as in standard photographic process?
>
> Yes, only better. And flourescents. Wonderful! :)
The best thing is st
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001 02:28:03 +0200 Tomasz Zakrzewski ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> How filmscanners get away with negatives exposed in tungsten halogen
> light?
> I do a lot of stage photography and during the printing process I get
> quite
> neutral prints but is this the case with filmscanne
Thomaz:
Tungsten light is always "warmer" by several Kelvins than natural light, as
you know. If you can't buy film rated for tungsten light (and I'm not sure
you can), you can use a light blue filter, which unfortunately reduces the
incident light you're working with (I don't know the filter
10 matches
Mail list logo
