PAUL GRAHAM wrote:
maybe other scanners use a brighter lightsource and so gain depth of focus
etc, but this one doesn't. I expect there is some trade made by Nikon
against using tubes for LED spectrum, long life, heat, consistency or ?...
I think you are correct, that this was a decision
Paul !
Nikon claims in their text that ED4000 are a professional product.
You call it earlier a semi professional product, and we shall not expect
more of the scanner. What kind of logic is that? Why shall we not expect
that the scanner are 100% sharp over the whole picture and still be easy to
Who many of us who are daily working with pictures are interested to put a
film in a carrier made of glass.???
Well, I prefer the glass especially for prints over 20x24"
I haven't had time to read all the posts in the last few weeks, and I
gathered from this topic/thread that the Nikon 8000
I'm hoping the new Nikons will help drive the price of these down to a place
where I could afford one!
Lawrence
http://www.lwsphoto.com
Please take a look at: http://www.imacon.dkand the
scanner Flextight
Photo or Polaroid.
This film scanners have not the Nikons problem with film
