On Wed, 10 Jan 2001 23:16:57 + photoscientia
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Oh no!
Not this again.
The answer is one word - linearity.
My reaction entirely :-)
Regards
Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio exhibit; + film scanner info
comparisons
Oh no!
Not this again.
The answer is one word - linearity.
My reaction entirely :-)
But linearity explains only one half of the issue - that is, that you can't
do BETTER for dynamic range than what is implied by the number of
bits. Linearity doesn't make the most useful point that
Finally!?
- Original Message -
From: Austin Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2001 5:59 PM
Subject: RE: So it's the bits? (Was: filmscanners: Sprintscan 120 nowon B+H
web
In other words number of
bits does NOT define Dmax, it only defines
