Collin Ong wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Arthur Entlich wrote:
>
>> Collin Ong wrote:
>>
>>> I believe that the main culprit is the totally nonsensical scan order, as
>>> you pointed out. The SDII scans frames from out to in, which maximizes
>>> the time the frames spend exposed to the enviro
In a message dated 3/7/2001 7:20:30 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Ed Hamrick: is there any way you can reverse the order the frames are
> scanned in? This would greatly improve the usability of this scanner.
This is on my list of things to look into. It shouldn't be too hard to
make Vue
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Arthur Entlich wrote:
> Collin Ong wrote:
> > I believe that the main culprit is the totally nonsensical scan order, as
> > you pointed out. The SDII scans frames from out to in, which maximizes
> > the time the frames spend exposed to the environment. Combine that with
> > t
Collin Ong wrote:
> I believe that the main culprit is the totally nonsensical scan order, as
> you pointed out. The SDII scans frames from out to in, which maximizes
> the time the frames spend exposed to the environment. Combine that with
> the fact that the scan direction for each frame i
I do have a dust problem. A piece of plastic wrap loosely placed over
the front and back cover of my ss4000 helps a good deal, protecting the
slides/negs on the holder and also blocking dust from getting in the
mechanism.
John M.
> What about putting a "dust guard" over the
> entrance area made
Collin Ong wrote:
>
>
> But, now dust will settle on the exposed flat surface of the other frames
> on the strip! This is such a problem with the Minolta Scan Dual II that I
> turned that scanner sideways to avoid dust problems!
>
> Collin
You've got some dust problem there! How does the
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Tim Victor wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 07, Collin Ong wrote:
> > But, now dust will settle on the exposed flat surface of the other frames
> > on the strip! This is such a problem with the Minolta Scan Dual II that I
> > turned that scanner sideways to avoid dust problems!
>
Collin Ong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 3:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Tilted Scans (was: filmscanners: Vuescan feedback )
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Reilly, Bob wrote:
> I've found that with my Canon FS2710 that the negative holder "tilts"
> no
Turn it on end perhaps?
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Collin Ong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 2:12 PM
Subject: RE: Tilted Scans (was: filmscanners: Vuescan feedback )
|
| On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Reilly, Bob wrote:
On Wednesday, March 07, Collin Ong wrote:
> But, now dust will settle on the exposed flat surface of the other frames
> on the strip! This is such a problem with the Minolta Scan Dual II that I
> turned that scanner sideways to avoid dust problems!
Interesting that you'd mention that, Collin. I
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Reilly, Bob wrote:
> I've found that with my Canon FS2710 that the negative holder "tilts"
> noticeably when a frame at either end is scanned. This is not too
...
> horizontal -- forget about the stick bending for this test). To solve this
> "problem" I simply turned the sc
I've found that with my Canon FS2710 that the negative holder "tilts"
noticeably when a frame at either end is scanned. This is not too
surprising since the holder is 6 frames long plus another 2 frames worth of
holder on the "right-hand" end and the internal bracket is only 1 frame
wide. (Try h
12 matches
Mail list logo