RE: filmscanners: 35mm film versus medium-format scan quality (Epson 2450)

2001-12-10 Thread Tony Sleep
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001 14:47:44 -0500 Austin Franklin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: I don't quite know what you mean. The physical sensor IS 4000 sensors per inch. The lenses used SHOULD be capable of resolving to beyond that... Actually there's a good reason for using a lens which resolves

RE: filmscanners: 35mm film versus medium-format scan quality (Epson 2450)

2001-12-10 Thread Tony Sleep
On Fri, 7 Dec 2001 17:53:50 - Jawed Ashraf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Dare I say it, but the mistake here might be the belief that a 4000dpi scanner is actually capable of 4000dpi scans (or samples per inch, if we want to reduce confusion). Anyone got any hard evidence of the

Re: filmscanners: 35mm film versus medium-format scan quality (Epson 2450)

2001-12-07 Thread Bernie Ess
A professional photographer who lives on selling his bw inkjet prints (Piezo) and has a long scanning experience with the Polaroid 120 and others, told me some days ago that he was able to do, from his new Epson 2450, absolutely stunning prints from a 6x7 neg up to 17x22 (inch) and still good

RE: filmscanners: 35mm film versus medium-format scan quality (Epson 2450)

2001-12-07 Thread Austin Franklin
Concerning 35mm - I have been able to print very good/ sharp looking prints at 11x14 with a 2.900dpi Nikon scan. Someone scanned one of the negs with his Nikon 4000 - ...but overall quality of the print was *not* better, no more visible detail. Bernhard, Might that have been because there

Re: filmscanners: 35mm film versus medium-format scan quality (Epson 2450)

2001-12-07 Thread Bernie Ess
] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 3:08 PM Subject: RE: filmscanners: 35mm film versus medium-format scan quality (Epson 2450) Concerning 35mm - I have been able to print very good/ sharp looking prints at 11x14 with a 2.900dpi Nikon scan. Someone scanned one of the negs with his Nikon 4000

Re: filmscanners: 35mm film versus medium-format scan quality(Epson 2450)

2001-12-07 Thread Mikel Peterson
Bernhard, I would go with c. I scanned a Velvia slide with my Minolta Multi and had a friend scan the same slide with his 4000 dpi Polaroid, and even up to Super A3 size, there was virtually no difference, other than the Minolta scan looked a little sharper, but I attribute that to slightly

RE: filmscanners: 35mm film versus medium-format scan quality (Epson 2450)

2001-12-07 Thread Austin Franklin
think its a mixture of b) and c) Greetings bernhard - Original Message - From: Austin Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 3:08 PM Subject: RE: filmscanners: 35mm film versus medium-format scan quality (Epson 2450) Concerning 35mm

RE: filmscanners: 35mm film versus medium-format scan quality (Epson 2450)

2001-12-07 Thread Jawed Ashraf
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Austin Franklin Sent: 07 December 2001 17:09 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: filmscanners: 35mm film versus medium-format scan quality (Epson 2450) Hi Bernhard, I believe I've heard that some Nikons can have focusing problems

RE: filmscanners: 35mm film versus medium-format scan quality (Epson 2450)

2001-12-07 Thread Austin Franklin
Dare I say it, but the mistake here might be the belief that a 4000dpi scanner is actually capable of 4000dpi scans (or samples per inch, if we want to reduce confusion). Anyone got any hard evidence of the *actual* resolving power of these scanners? Jawed Hi Jawed, I don't quite know