Polaroid help (was Re: filmscanners: CANON FS4000US vs NIKON IVED)

2001-06-14 Thread Sam A. McCandless
At 12:02 PM -0500 12/20/99, Hemingway, David J wrote: >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Date: Mon, 20 Dec 1999 12:02:20 -0500 >From: "Hemingway, David J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: Assistance with Polaroid products >To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Reply-To: [

Re: filmscanners: CANON FS4000US vs NIKON IV ED

2001-06-14 Thread Robert Meier
--- Chris Hargens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also,overall, I've heard good things about > Polaroid's customer service Well, I could give you an example of extremely bad customer service from Polaroid. Without brut force it was impossible to insert the plastic film-strip holder into my new SS400

Re: filmscanners: CANON FS4000US vs NIKON IV ED

2001-06-11 Thread Lorne W. Stobbs
sage - From: "Chris Hargens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2001 2:25 AM Subject: Re: filmscanners: CANON FS4000US vs NIKON IV ED > I hope some good reviews come out, otherwise I'll probably opt for the > SprintScan 4000.

Re: filmscanners: CANON FS4000US vs NIKON IV ED

2001-06-09 Thread Steve Greenbank
D]> Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2001 2:25 AM Subject: Re: filmscanners: CANON FS4000US vs NIKON IV ED > I hope some good reviews come out, otherwise I'll probably opt for the > SprintScan 4000. It's price has gone down and it's bundled with SilverFast. > Also,overall, I

Re: filmscanners: CANON FS4000US vs NIKON IV ED

2001-06-08 Thread Chris Hargens
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 12:02 PM Subject: Re: filmscanners: CANON FS4000US vs NIKON IV ED > i guess the long wait for the improved canon was a waste of time. it > seems that i always wait for the next improved version of many computer > products and the

Re: filmscanners: CANON FS4000US vs NIKON IV ED

2001-06-08 Thread jm1209
i guess the long wait for the improved canon was a waste of time. it seems that i always wait for the next improved version of many computer products and they wind up not being all that much better. the nikon has a better advertised dynamic range but less resolution. possibly this may be a bett

Re: filmscanners: CANON FS4000US vs NIKON IV ED

2001-06-08 Thread Arthur Entlich
AR Studio wrote: > > Canoscan FS4000. but resolution is lower. > > Does that help? > > Helen + Andrew Well, That's disappointing. I'm hoping you got a defective one ;-) Sounds like it is little to no improvement over the 2700 FS 2710 then. Art

Re: filmscanners: CANON FS4000US vs NIKON IV ED

2001-06-07 Thread AR Studio
rd that. to sum it up, in the same price range, nikon IV's quality is better than Canoscan FS4000. but resolution is lower. Does that help? Helen + Andrew - Original Message - From: jm1209 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 4:03 PM

filmscanners: CANON FS4000US

2001-06-07 Thread jm1209
i saw that this scanner is in stock at b&h and was wondering if anyone had purchased one and what was the initial response to the quality. i am trying to decide between this and the nikon iv ed. i have been waiting to make a purchase for sometime but have been holding out for this new generation