Just a thought - I don't know the guts of how Photoshop produces histograms,
so this may not work as well as I think it could... Would it be a useful
comparison of scanners to scan the same slide with Vuescan to raw files
and compare the histograms? It seemed to me that this might give some sort
<>
G'day rob.
Being in your neck of the woods (well, at least the same hemisphere!), I
would be happy to share a slide or negative or two, and produce some raw
scans on my Acer 2720S. Let me know if you get any other responses, and
I'll give you a postal address.
I think it would be an inte
Ooops. Apologies to list members for more clutter. It was *meant* to be
offlist..
..old age approacheth!..
mark t
At 07:51 PM 28/08/01 +0930, Mark T slipped up and wrote:
><>
>
>G'day rob.
etc..
>Just a thought - I don't know the guts of how Photoshop produces histograms,
>so this may not work as well as I think it could... Would it be a useful
>comparison of scanners to scan the same slide with Vuescan to raw files
>and compare the histograms?
I suggest Stouffer gray target from www.dar
"Mike Duncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Just a thought - I don't know the guts of how Photoshop produces
histograms,
> >so this may not work as well as I think it could... Would it be a useful
> >comparison of scanners to scan the same slide with Vuescan to raw files
> >and compare the histogr
>"Mike Duncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I suggest Stouffer gray target from www.darkroom-innovations.com. You'll
>> find media settings in VS make big difference in OD range.
>
>A gray target would be nice but I don't think I could afford the import at
>the moment.
You might try your photo
