I am a complete newbie at this photography/scanning stuff. After playing
with my camera, flatbed scanner and new Scanwit for a couple months now, I
have started to get a bit more serious about understanding what I am doing.
This week I shot some pictures using FUGI Super HG 200 bracketing the
exp
"Frank Nichols" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. With 200 film, is the grain "large" enough for the 2700 DPI to record
it?
> If so could some one describe it (or email me a couple scan clips showing
> examples?)
Colour neg films have a random mixture of different sized dye clouds. The
only C41 fi
At 07:26 PM 6/30/01 -0600, Frank Nichols wrote:
>1. With 200 film, is the grain "large" enough for the 2700 DPI to record it?
>If so could some one describe it (or email me a couple scan clips showing
>examples?)
To answer your question. Yes.
Frank, the biggest single improvement in my photo
I suggest you try this grain reduction algorithm... similar to PS Smart Blur but
better at isolating smooth backgrounds from a face etc.., experiment with small
images first to find the right settings.
http://www.rphotoz.com/astrophoto/bgsmoothwindl.html
rafeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>As I
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001 23:31:24 -0400 rafeb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >1. With 200 film, is the grain "large" enough for the 2700 DPI to
> record it?
> >If so could some one describe it (or email me a couple scan clips
> showing
> >examples?)
>
>
> To answer your question. Yes.
I suggest y
On Sat, 30 Jun 2001 19:26:33 -0600 Frank Nichols ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> 1. With 200 film, is the grain "large" enough for the 2700 DPI to
> record it?
> If so could some one describe it (or email me a couple scan clips
> showing
> examples?)
No, IME you are unlikely to see genuine grai
At 12:07 AM 7/2/01 +0100, Tony Sleep wrote:
>On Sat, 30 Jun 2001 19:26:33 -0600 Frank Nichols ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
>wrote:
>
>> 1. With 200 film, is the grain "large" enough for the 2700 DPI to
>> record it?
>> If so could some one describe it (or email me a couple scan clips
>> showing
>> exam
Which brings up some additional questions--
I'm a real newbie to this area, though a physicist by trade. I've suddenly
gotten interested in photography again, after a long lapse. I bought me an
Acer 2740S, which seems to be a reasonable low-cost entry machine, and
began exploring unknown (to me
> Frank, the biggest single improvement in my photo
> "technique" these last couple of years was giving
> up on generic ISO 200 negative films.
I took a different approach...I use MF. I can shoot Tri-X till the cows come home,
developed D-76 1:1, and they look very good IMO. I know that's B
