I made a recent report in which I told of a technique for using Unsharp Mask
in Photoshop to compensate for the softening caused by using ICE in the
Nikon Super coolscan 4000. Despite this, I was still upset by the fantastic
amount of all sorts of crud and spots that showed up on my scans, despit
e dust you have are in
the film
Best regards Mikael Risedal
--
>From: Barbara & Martin Greene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: filmscanners: Further report on dust problem in LS4000
>Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2001 21:38
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 9:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Further report on dust problem in LS4000
I made a recent report in which I told of a technique for using Unsharp Mask
in Photoshop to compensate for the softening caused by using ICE in the
Nikon Super coolsca
"Hemingway, David J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> cathode or fluorescent scanner. Over the last few years discussion on this
> list and my personal testing seems to have said that the "collimated" type
> light source of a LED light source "shows" more dust etc. In my personal
> view I wonder if an
