I'm thinking about buying either a Nikon Coolscan IV (LS-40)
or a refurbished LS-2000. Both nearly same price. What do you
think? The current "little brother" model or the older
"middle brother" model.
Thanks for any comparisons or input. The specs are nearly
identical.
Dave
Dave writes ...
> I'm thinking about buying either a Nikon
> Coolscan IV (LS-40) or a refurbished LS-2000.
> Both nearly same price. What do you think?
> The current "little brother" model or
> the older "middle brother" model.
> ... The specs are nearly identical.
The specs are identic
d want
the ability to use all of the features of both, thus the LS-40 would be the
better bet overall.
- Original Message -
From: "shAf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 4:16 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: LS-2000 VS LS-40
>
The only advantage I see to buying the older one is it is a "proven".
Of course, it is proven defective, but that's another story ;-)
The main advantage of buying the newer one is a better warranty
(ha,ha... it is a Nikon...) maybe better software support (I don't know
if the firmware has been
"Edwin Eleazer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Version 3.1 of NikonScan will be out in the next week
Hmm... I wonder if this might include some attempt at fixing the jaggies
problem?
Rob
--Original Message-From: DeVries
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 2:20
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
filmscanners: LS-2000 VS LS-40
I'm thinking about buying either a Nikon Coolscan IV (LS-40)
or a refurbished LS-2000. Both nearly same price. What
Jac writes ...
> ... I am really proud of the job
> our folks did in working with Nikon
> to put Digital ROC and Digital GEM
> on this scanner. ...
>
> All this to say, if I were choosing between a scanner with
> Digital ROC and Digital GEM or a scanner without it, I would
> choose the one with.
OK. So which other scanners offer these feature currently, and which
are being upgraded to offer them? Is Nikon going to offer these added
features for the LS-2000?
Art
Jack Phipps wrote:
> All this to say, if I were choosing between a scanner with Digital ROC
> and Digital GEM or a scann
1 2:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: LS-2000 VS LS-40
Jac writes ...
> ... I am really proud of the job
> our folks did in working with Nikon
> to put Digital ROC and Digital GEM
> on this scanner. ...
>
> All this to say, if I were choosing between a scanner w
