In their zeal to make totally electronic cameras, Canon eliminated
the sprocket that counts eight holes per frame, replacing it with an
infrared sensor. I'd suggest that plays a role your nonstandard
spacing.
Ah. I see. What a PITA. :-(
Having said that, it looks to be a combination of
Mark Otway wrote:
In their zeal to make totally electronic cameras, Canon eliminated
the sprocket that counts eight holes per frame, replacing it with an
infrared sensor. I'd suggest that plays a role your nonstandard
spacing.
Ah. I see. What a PITA. :-(
Having said that, it looks
In their zeal to make totally electronic cameras, Canon eliminated
the sprocket that counts eight holes per frame, replacing it with an
infrared sensor. I'd suggest that plays a role your nonstandard
spacing.
Ah. I see. What a PITA. :-(
Having said that, it looks to be a combination of
:-(
Still having problems with this. Most of the films I've tried seem to
scan fine now, after playing around with the frame offset and cropping
settings. However, I've got a particular set of negative strips which
seem to have non-standard frame spacing (it's slightly wider than the
In a message dated 12/3/2001 4:32:12 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I notice there's a frame spacing option mentioned in the help file, but
that option doesn't appear when I run Vuescan. Does the LS-40 not
support this setting?
I regret to say that it doesn't.
Is there any other way I
At 09:25 03/12/01 +, Mark Otway wrote:
However, I've got a particular set of negative strips which
seem to have non-standard frame spacing (it's slightly wider than the
frame-spacing on the Fuji film I usually use).
Surely, the frame spacing has no relationship to the make of film. It
Surely, the frame spacing has no relationship to the make of
film. It should be a standard 8 sprocket holes. Any variance
has to come from the camera. Some very cheap ones don't even
register the sprocket holes and vary spacing throughout a film.
Both rolls were shot on a Canon EOS300
Mark Otway wrote:
Surely, the frame spacing has no relationship to the make of
film. It should be a standard 8 sprocket holes. Any variance
has to come from the camera. Some very cheap ones don't even
register the sprocket holes and vary spacing throughout a film.
Both rolls were
Surely, the frame spacing has no relationship to the make of
film. It should be a standard 8 sprocket holes. Any variance
has to come from the camera. Some very cheap ones don't even
register the sprocket holes and vary spacing throughout a film.
Both rolls were shot on a Canon
