Hi all,
Quick, and possibly dumb, question: all of the pictures I've seen of the
LS-40 have shown it stood on its side - i.e., with the 'Nikon' logo at
the correct orientation, and the power light at the top. However, I note
that it has rubber feet on the 'side', implying that it can also be
Otway
Sent: 27 November 2001 09:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Nikon Coolscan IV - positioning
Hi all,
Quick, and possibly dumb, question: all of the pictures I've seen of the
LS-40 have shown it stood on its side - i.e., with the 'Nikon' logo at
the correct orientation
Mark Otway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latter would suit my desk layout better, but will it affect the
scanner's performance in any way? Is there an optimal position, or will
it make no difference?
My LS30 has been lying on its side for about a year now. It works fine.
One possible
Rob Geraghty schrieb:
Mark Otway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The latter would suit my desk layout better, but will it affect the
scanner's performance in any way? Is there an optimal position, or will
it make no difference?
My LS30 has been lying on its side for about a year now. It
No difference in performance or scan quality.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Mark Otway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 3:03 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Nikon Coolscan IV - positioning
|
| Hi all,
|
| Quick, and possibly dumb, question: all
Ralf wrote:
I have encountered one serious drawback as to operating my
LS-30 flat: When using the film strip holder (the tiny
metal-plastic thing, not the motor-driven feeder), the focus
would be inaccurate, apparently as a result of the oscillating
scanner movement.
Well, that surprises