filmscanners: Nikonscan vs Vuescan

2001-11-21 Thread Rob Geraghty
Jawed wrote: >By vitality I don't merely mean contrast/black-point/white-point. I also >mean the nature of the tonality of the image. Something related to the >question of "gamma" and also the inherent S-shaped response that all films >have (so far as I know). So, all the effort I put into obta

RE: filmscanners: Nikonscan vs Vuescan

2001-11-22 Thread Jawed Ashraf
> > Jawed wrote: > >By vitality I don't merely mean contrast/black-point/white-point. I also > >mean the nature of the tonality of the image. Something related to the > >question of "gamma" and also the inherent S-shaped response that > all films > >have (so far as I know). So, all the effort

Re: filmscanners: Nikonscan vs Vuescan

2001-11-22 Thread Rob Geraghty
"Jawed Ashraf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Out of interest, which scanner are you using? > LS40. How many bits does Nikonscan deliver? ISTR it's only 8, but the input is 14? Rob

RE: filmscanners: Nikonscan vs Vuescan

2001-11-22 Thread Jawed Ashraf
No, from the LS40, Nikon Scan will deliver 12 bits inside a 16-bit file. Jawed > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Geraghty > Sent: 22 November 2001 12:51 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: filmscanners: Ni

filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Nikonscan vs Vuescan

2001-11-22 Thread Rob Geraghty
Jawed wrote: > No, from the LS40, Nikon Scan will deliver 12 bits > inside a 16-bit file. That would certainly make Nikonscan useful! :) Rob Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wordweb.com