>PS. I have just recently returned to this list after a long break. Does
>anybody know if Ed Hamrick still partakes?
Dunno.
> If not does anybody have his
>email address at hand?
I think it's [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rob Geraghty
Sent: Friday, 20 July 2001 11:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Vuescan gripes
Rafe wrote:
>Ayup. I still wonder why Vuescan is so revered by so many.
>Earlier versions didn&
Rafe wrote:
>Ayup. I still wonder why Vuescan is so revered by so many.
>Earlier versions didn't even have a preview window.
Because it gets me results from my scanner I simply can't get with the OEM
driver. Sure, the interface could be improved, but *any* interface that
gets me better results
John wrote:
> it is far too easy to forget to change the output file name when
> starting a new scan.
True, but if you use the "+" after the filename in Vuescan at least you
won't overwrite anything. :)
>user interface. Human interface design clearly isn't something that lights
>Ed's candle, an
