At 9:06 AM +0100 9/21/01, Alan Tyson wrote:
>I have seen something similar recently (5K Scanwit/Vuescan
>positive clip attached) on a neg film processed in a
>brand-new Kodak minilab in my local Tesco store. The bubbles
>on mine are about 140 microns diameter (15pixels @ 2700ppi),
>but I can't tel
At 10:53 AM +1000 9/23/01, Rob Geraghty wrote:
>When I spoke to the lab, they said that Fuji and Kodak films
>behaved quite differently in that chemistry tended to sit in the sprocket
>holes on the kodak film - resulting in the rings - but didn't on Fuji film.
>It sounds to me like the surface ten
at UNB and I know a Roger Smith
in the Chem. Dept. at Mt. Allison. Are you working at both campuses?
Regards,
Owen
- Original Message -
From: "Roger Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 3:44 PM
Subject: filmscanner
"Roger Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not only is the Fuji slide sharper, it shows relatively few,
> large bubbles compared to the Kodak slide. The Fuji bubbles appear as
> a few fairly obvious spots on a scan - easy to spot out in Photoshop.
> The Kodak slide when scanned shows a gritty, gra
Roger wrote:
> As you may have read, I now realize these mysterious
> "bubbles" are in undeveloped film and thus are not a
> product of developing quirks. I'm sorry for making
> such a misleading statement.
No need to apologise. I was expecting that they might have been bubbles
in the plastic o
