Stan wrote: > That would indicate that unexposed, processed, E-6 is relatively > transparent to IR even though it may be almost opaque to visible > light. Might this vary from one E-6 film to another? Probably, > but I would guess only in degree, not in kind. That is, I would > expect all E-6 film to be relatively transparent to IR. Which leaves me stumped for the origin of these spots and why the IR dust filter in Vuescan doesn't remove them. I've never experienced this problem with the scanner before. I'll have to try scanning the same slide with Nikonscan to see if ICE behaves any differently from Vuescan. I thought it might have been connected with multipass scanning, but a single pass scan looked pretty much the same. Rob Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://wordweb.com
- filmscanners: When if Provia 100F a poor film to scan...und... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: When if Provia 100F a poor film to s... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: When if Provia 100F a poor film ... Stan McQueen
- filmscanners: Polaroid under major financial p... Rob Geraghty
- filmscanners: Polaroid under major financi... Andrea de Polo
- Re: filmscanners: Polaroid under majo... Raphael Bustin
- Re: filmscanners: Polaroid under ... James L. Sims
- filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: When is Provia 100... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: When is Pr... Gordon Tassi
- filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: When is Pr... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: W... Arthur Entlich
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanner... Rob Geraghty
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: When i... Jim Snyder
- Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: W... Rob Geraghty