Just got a SS4000 to replace an LS-2000. After a day of use I find the
SS4000 is not as convenient as the LS-2000, but the scans are first rate! A
significant improvement over the LS-2000. Here are some observations:
- Got the unit from Micro Warehouse which charged US$100.00 more than eCost,
and
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 11:36 PM
Subject: filmscanners: SS4000 comments
> Just got a SS4000 to replace an LS-2000. After a day of use I find the
> SS4000 is not as convenient as the LS-2000, but the scans are first rate!
A
&g
: Re: filmscanners: SS4000 comments
>
>
> Thanks for the info Wire.
>
> I have a question about the different platforms for this
> scanner. I ran
> across a site with prices very close to the ecost price, but
> the description
> read for MACs - no mention of PCs.
Mike,
They are flimsy, but seem tougher than you think. Mine have never broken.
You do want a second one, though -- in fact, I'd recommend it to everyone
with a SS4000. That way you can be scanning one strip while loading the
other. Really speeds up scanning.
Tom
From: "Mike Stephens"
> They
Wire Moore wrote:
>
> Just got a SS4000 to replace an LS-2000. After a day of use I find the
> SS4000 is not as convenient as the LS-2000, but the scans are first rate! A
> significant improvement over the LS-2000. Here are some observations:
>
That was a great review and very valuable. Tha
Wire wrote an excellent comparison of the SS4000 and LS-2000. Objective and unbiased. The SS4000 is indeed a fine scanner.
A week or so ago someone asked if they should order any extra film carriers for the SS4000. I responded that I didn't think it was necessary. I said that one of the plasti
One size fits all
-Original Message-
From: James Hill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2001 12:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: filmscanners: SS4000 comments
Thanks for the info Wire.
I have a question about the different platforms for
> - The SS4000 SCSI connectors are two different types: one DB-25 and one
> Centronics (and odd combination).
The DB25 is a Mac standard for external SCSI connections...and the
Centronics type is a typical SCSI I connection. Not really odd, but
definitely old technology.
