filmscanners: SV: filmscanners??: Resolution??. Scientific method??

2000-11-17 Thread Ingemar Lindahl
I just joined the list. Give me one good reason to stay on! Where is the generosity? Where is the wish to explain what you really mean? Where is the touch of humbleness before the fact that most of what you claim is based on your own, by definition narrow, personal experience? And where is the

Re: filmscanners: SV: filmscanners??: Resolution??. Scientific method??

2000-11-17 Thread Guy Prince
Hello Ingemar, You have to lurk through it and grab what you can. The people here are very helpful and knowledgeable, but on the same side they are a bunch of over-educated nincompoops. One just needs to be able to dissect what is useful, and what is a load.

RE: filmscanners: SV: filmscanners??: Resolution??. Scientific method??

2000-11-17 Thread Austin Franklin
> The people here are very helpful and knowledgeable, but on the > same side they are a bunch of over-educated nincompoops. Hum. It looks like you just changed the name, but not the email address, and managed to send this to the entire list...

Re: filmscanners: SV: filmscanners??: Resolution??. Scientific method??

2000-11-18 Thread Tony Sleep
> the real wish to share hard-found knowledge, practical or theoretical? That is actually one thing this list has been pretty good at. Do you have a specific scanning question you would like answered? Regards Tony Sleep http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner

Re[2]: filmscanners: SV: filmscanners??: Resolution??. Scientific method??

2000-11-17 Thread Guy Prince
Oh Austin. Uh, yeah. I did that. I have 3 emails that you sent to the list in a reply to several questions I had. You and two others solved my problem in less than two days. Awesome. But if you go back through these goofy theads ... Friday, Novembe