Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote on Sun, 5 Aug
2001 18:15:54 -0500
> I prefer VueScan as it gets the range and color scanned
>essentially well in the first instance, and *will* pick up all of the
>dynamic range my scanner will retrieve, and any corrections I wish to make I
>will mak
tive) and the cost is just not worthwhile over VueScan plus NikonScan.
For my flatbed, however, the <$50 cost is worth it over the Epson TWAIN 4.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2001 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Silv
In a message dated 8/4/2001 11:28:18 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have read a great deal about SilverFast, can someone tell me the
advantages of SilverFast over say Nikon Scan 3.1 and VueScan?
James Grove
I can think of several hundred differences between SilverFast an
I have read a great deal about SilverFast, can someone tell me the
advantages of SilverFast over say Nikon Scan 3.1 and VueScan?
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk
http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk
ICQ 99737573
