Re: filmscanners: Size of scan files

2001-05-20 Thread Richard N. Moyer
More information in the higher ISO film. LZW is a near lossless compression. With the lower ISO film, you had less information. And, not necessarily grain information in the 800 film, you could well have greater gamut/saturation, greater light latitude in the 800 film. The Fuji 800 films are

RE: filmscanners: Size of scan files

2001-05-20 Thread Lynn Allen
Rob wrote: It looks like the excessive grain of the fast film compresses very poorly, while the almost non-existent grain of Provia 100F compresses very well. That sounds perfectly possible to me. Grain is a form of texture, and a textured backround will eat up a *lot* of memory (unless it's

RE: filmscanners: Size of scan files

2001-05-20 Thread Rob Geraghty
Lynn wrote: That sounds perfectly possible to me. Grain is a form of texture, and a textured backround will eat up a *lot* of memory (unless it's mathmatical--which grain isn't, AFAIK). Exactly. Because the grain pattern is random, it doesn't compress well. I was just pointing out an

Re: filmscanners: Size of scan files

2001-05-20 Thread Rob Geraghty
Richard wrote: More information in the higher ISO film. That's an interesting way of looking at it. I would have said the opposite; that there is less information lost in *more* noise. LZW is a near lossless compression. With the lower ISO film, you had less information. And, not