On Fri, 29 Jun 2001 19:06:18 +1000 Rob Geraghty ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
I have seen banding in a SS4000 scan when using layers to bring up dark
details. Under normal circumstances you would never see it though.
Hmm, well, I quite often do this, and still have never seen banding. Yours
Hemingway, David J wrote:
Rafe,
FYI, I also have a new 8000 ED that has the same banding issue but I am
having a hard time getting upset over it.:) When I do the fine ccd it does
get rid of the problem but when I read the help associated with the
button it says that fine CCD can add as
Rafe wrote:
Shoulda listend to my wife. She said to give up
on film, get a digital camera.
Hope Rafe has a good, sturdy kitchen table! ;-)
--LRA
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
At 01:04 PM 6/30/01 -, Lynn Allen wrote:
Rafe wrote:
Shoulda listend to my wife. She said to give up
on film, get a digital camera.
Hope Rafe has a good, sturdy kitchen table! ;-)
--LRA
Huh? Sorry, that one went right over my head.
rafe b.
On Fri, 29 Jun 2001 19:06:18 +1000 Rob Geraghty ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
I have seen banding in a SS4000 scan when using layers to bring up dark
details. Under normal circumstances you would never see it though.
Hmm, well, I quite often do this, and still have never seen banding. Yours
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: exposing C41 for scanning ( was gibberish
header)
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 11:31:44 -0400
At 01:04 PM 6/30/01 -, Lynn Allen wrote:
Rafe wrote:
Shoulda listend to my wife. She said to give up
on film, get a digital camera.
Hope Rafe has
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 16:40:18 - Lynn Allen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Darned good advice, Tony. I've definitely seen this, and thought I'd
misunderstood the whole process!! Unfortunately, I didn't have this
information (or a scanner) 20 years ago. Still, I can avoid the problem
in
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 07:48:39 -0400 (EDT) Raphael Bustin
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
but I wonder about the wisdom
of overexposing C41 film that will be
scanned.
In my experience, it's the dense images that
are more likely to stress the scanner into
banding.
IDLE SPECULATION This
Tony Sleep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No banding problems here, ever, with a SS4000.
I have seen banding in a SS4000 scan when using layers to bring up dark
details. Under normal circumstances you would never see it though.
Rob
At 07:47 AM 6/29/01 +0100, you wrote:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 07:48:39 -0400 (EDT) Raphael Bustin
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
but I wonder about the wisdom
of overexposing C41 film that will be
scanned.
In my experience, it's the dense images that
are more likely to stress the scanner
. Having a hard time getting upset about that to. Oh well!!
David
-Original Message-
From: rafeb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 5:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: exposing C41 for scanning ( was gibberish
header)
At 07:47 AM 6/29/01
At 05:15 PM 6/29/01 -0400, Dave H. wrote:
Rafe,
FYI, I also have a new 8000 ED that has the same banding issue but I am
having a hard time getting upset over it.:) When I do the fine ccd it does
get rid of the problem but when I read the help associated with the
button it says that fine CCD can
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:14:56 +1000 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rob=20Geraghty?=
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I presume you're talking C41 films here, Tony? I also presume you're
saying
that exposing a C41 400ASA film at EI320 improves the results but
doesn't
require any special treatment at the lab?
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Tony Sleep wrote:
Yes, C41, processed normally. ISO ratings are often a bit optimistic, and
an extra half-stop or so can help reduce grain and add separation in
shadow areas by adding some density. The overlapping dye clouds softens
the appearance of grain
Tony wrote:
Generally, if you are seeing green-blue speckle in shadows from colour neg
(look like CCD noise, but can't be - CCD noise in negs afflicts
highlights, the densest part of the film, and manifests as yellow/magenta
speckle), giving a little more neg exposure will reduce this
Raphael Bustin wrote:
In my experience, it's the dense images that
are more likely to stress the scanner into
banding. Alas, I have seen this even with
my LS-8000. It's mortal, after all (boo hoo.)
The more I've worked with the name we pay extra to won, the more I
recognize their
16 matches
Mail list logo
