Frank,
Do you use a dry towel. Or is it moistened with something?
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 7:14 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: horribly dirty negatives from SS4000
One thing I have always
- Original Message -
From: Johnny Deadman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Filmscanners [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 7:59 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: horribly dirty negatives from SS4000
on 9/11/00 8:05 pm, Robert Kehl at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Artix4000t
Geoff wrote:
I'm not sure how labs manage to scratch negs so badly!
Ever watched how they throw them around before they sleeve them?
Rob
Rob Geraghty wrote:
Geoff wrote:
I'm not sure how labs manage to scratch negs so badly!
Ever watched how they throw them around before they sleeve them?
Rob
Many labs have a very bad policy with film handling. The majority of
people do not order reprints, and since the film is
Rob Geraghty wrote:
Geoff wrote:
I'm not sure how labs manage to scratch negs so badly!
Ever watched how they throw them around before they sleeve them?
Rob
Many labs have a very bad policy with film handling. The majority of
people do not order reprints, and since the film is
Art wrote:
Many labs have a very bad policy with film handling. The majority of
people do not order reprints, and since the film is usually printed
before it is cut and sleeved, a lot of the scratches are put on after
the printer is done with them, or by the automated film gate (again,
after the
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: horribly dirty negatives from SS4000
One thing I have always noticed is that slides seem to be much easier to
keep clean than negatives. Negatives seem to attract dust like a magnet.
When using the HP PhotoSmart my rule of thumb is, get it right the first
time
Frank Paris wrote:
Has anyone had trouble with their SS4000 producing horribly dusty and
scratchy negatives? I can't believe how filthy my negatives are and how much
time I have to spend cleaning them up. I never had this problem with my HP
PhotoSmart. Things seem to be getting worse,
://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 3:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: horribly dirty negatives from SS4000
Frank Paris wrote
- Original Message -
From: Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 12:04 AM
Subject: filmscanners: horribly dirty negatives from SS4000
Has anyone had trouble with their SS4000 producing horribly dusty and
scratchy negatives? I can't
on 9/11/00 8:05 pm, Robert Kehl at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Artix4000t definately gives me sharper higher resolution prints from y
Epson 2000P especially at 13"x19". But the time I spend cleaning and
spotting is a high price to pay. My conclusion? I am using the Nikon for
my first
://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Kehl
Sent: Thursday, November 09, 2000 5:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: horribly dirty negatives from SS4000
- Original
The dust problems are almost certainly to do with your scanning
environment and your general treatment of the negs. I have absolutely
NO dust problems with my SS4000... to the point that I literally spot
only one or two dots and then only on some negatives.
Has anyone had trouble with their SS4000 producing horribly dusty and
scratchy negatives? I can't believe how filthy my negatives are and how much
time I have to spend cleaning them up. I never had this problem with my HP
PhotoSmart. Things seem to be getting worse, too. I just got through
14 matches
Mail list logo
